Culvert design for aquatic organism passage: an enviromental approach
Journal: Region - Water Conservancy DOI: 10.32629/rwc.v9i1.5140
Abstract
The design of culverts at road and watercourse crossings, such as streams or rivers, has traditionally focused on the hydraulic safety requirements for the road. This approach to culvert design has neglected the biological elements of the watercourse, such as fish and other aquatic organisms, which are an essential part of the ecosystem and are disrupted by the physical barrier of the culvert. Furthermore, some physical factors are also altered, such as erosion and the deposition of sediments and debris, which also change the environmental conditions for fish, resulting in barriers that impede the natural development of their life cycle and endanger their reproduction. With an eye toward environmentally friendly design, concepts and guidelines have been developed for the design of culverts at road and watercourse crossings that facilitate the passage of aquatic organisms through the culvert, allowing them to move as they would in the natural watercourse. This paper presents some guidelines for the environmentally friendly design of culverts, which are addressed by Kilgore et al (2010), Schall et al. (2012), Bates and Kirn (2009), Henrik et al (2019), Kozarek and Mielke (2015), Olson et al (2017) and Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife (2016).
Keywords
rivers; culvert; fish passage; environment
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 0 TimesReferences
[1] Anderson, J. T., Ward, L.R., Todd, J., Kite, J. S., y Strager, M.P. (2014). Culvert Effects on Stream and Stream-Side Salamander Habitats. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, Vol. 5, No. 3.
DOI: 10.7763/IJESD. 2014.V5.491
[2] Anderson, P.T. (2011). Design for Aquatic Organism Passage at Road-Stream Crossings: Simple Stream Simulation Example. USDA Forest Service.
https://www.dirtandgravel.psu.edu/sites/default/files/Education%20Training/workshops/2012/ documents/AOP.pdf
[3] Bates, K. K. y Kirn, R. (2009). Aquatic Organism Passage Design and Stream Assessments: Guidelines for the Design of Stream/Road Crossings for Passage of Aquatic Organisms in Vermont.Vermont Department of Fish y Wildlife. https://vtfishandwildlife.com/sites/fishandwildlife/files/documents/Learn%20More/Library/REP ORTS%20AND%20DOCUMENTS/AOP/GUIDESLINES%20FOR%20DESIGN.pdf
[4] Hernick, M.,Lenhart, C.,Kozarek, J.yNieber, J. (2019). Minnesota Guide for Stream Connectivity and Aquatic Organism Passage through Culverts. Final Report. University of Minnesota. https://www.dot.state.mn.us/research/reports/2019/201902.pdf
[5] Kilgore, R. T., Bergendahl, B. S., y Hotchkiss, R. (2010). Culvert design for Aquatic Organism Passage. Hydraulic Engineering Circular Number 26 (HEC-26). FHWA HIF-11-008. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/11008/hif11008.pdf
[6] Kozarek, J. y Mielke, S. (2015). Sediment Transport through Recessed Culverts: Laboratory Experiments Final Report. University of Minnesota. https://www.lrrb.org/pdf/201508.pdf
[7] Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente (2015). Prescripciones técnicas para el diseño de pasos de fauna y vallados perimetrales (2da ed., revisada y ampliada). Documentos para la reducción de la fragmentación de hábitats causada por infraestructuras de transportes, No. 1. 139 pp
Autor.https://www.miteco.gob.es/content/dam/miteco/es/biodiversidad/temas/ecosistemas-y-conectividad prescripciones_pasos_vallados_2a_edicion_tcm30-195791.pdf
[8] Olson, J.C., Marcarelli, A.M., Timm, A.L.,Eggert, S.L. yKolka, R.K. (2017). Evaluating the Effects of Culver Designs on Ecosystem Processesin Northern Wisconsin Streams. River Researchand Applications. 33: 777–787 (2017).
[9] Schall, J. D., Thompson, P. L., Zerges, S. M., Kilgore, R. T., y Morris, J. L. (2012). Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts.(3th. ed.). FHWA-HIF-12-026. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/12026/hif12026.pdf
[10] United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service (USFS, 2008). Stream simulation: An ecological approach to provide passage for aquatic organisms at road stream crossing. U.S. Forest Service. Forest Service Simulation Working Group (FSSWG). Author. https://www.fs.fed.us/eng/pubs/pdf/StreamSimulation/hi_res/%20FullDoc.pdf
[11] Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department (VFWD, 2016). Vermont Stream Crossing Handbook. Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department.
Author https://vtfishandwildlife.com/sites/fishandwildlife/files/documents/Learn%20More/Library/REP ORTS%20AND%20DOCUMENTS/AOP/AOP%20HANDBOOK.pdf
DOI: 10.7763/IJESD. 2014.V5.491
[2] Anderson, P.T. (2011). Design for Aquatic Organism Passage at Road-Stream Crossings: Simple Stream Simulation Example. USDA Forest Service.
https://www.dirtandgravel.psu.edu/sites/default/files/Education%20Training/workshops/2012/ documents/AOP.pdf
[3] Bates, K. K. y Kirn, R. (2009). Aquatic Organism Passage Design and Stream Assessments: Guidelines for the Design of Stream/Road Crossings for Passage of Aquatic Organisms in Vermont.Vermont Department of Fish y Wildlife. https://vtfishandwildlife.com/sites/fishandwildlife/files/documents/Learn%20More/Library/REP ORTS%20AND%20DOCUMENTS/AOP/GUIDESLINES%20FOR%20DESIGN.pdf
[4] Hernick, M.,Lenhart, C.,Kozarek, J.yNieber, J. (2019). Minnesota Guide for Stream Connectivity and Aquatic Organism Passage through Culverts. Final Report. University of Minnesota. https://www.dot.state.mn.us/research/reports/2019/201902.pdf
[5] Kilgore, R. T., Bergendahl, B. S., y Hotchkiss, R. (2010). Culvert design for Aquatic Organism Passage. Hydraulic Engineering Circular Number 26 (HEC-26). FHWA HIF-11-008. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/11008/hif11008.pdf
[6] Kozarek, J. y Mielke, S. (2015). Sediment Transport through Recessed Culverts: Laboratory Experiments Final Report. University of Minnesota. https://www.lrrb.org/pdf/201508.pdf
[7] Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente (2015). Prescripciones técnicas para el diseño de pasos de fauna y vallados perimetrales (2da ed., revisada y ampliada). Documentos para la reducción de la fragmentación de hábitats causada por infraestructuras de transportes, No. 1. 139 pp
Autor.https://www.miteco.gob.es/content/dam/miteco/es/biodiversidad/temas/ecosistemas-y-conectividad prescripciones_pasos_vallados_2a_edicion_tcm30-195791.pdf
[8] Olson, J.C., Marcarelli, A.M., Timm, A.L.,Eggert, S.L. yKolka, R.K. (2017). Evaluating the Effects of Culver Designs on Ecosystem Processesin Northern Wisconsin Streams. River Researchand Applications. 33: 777–787 (2017).
[9] Schall, J. D., Thompson, P. L., Zerges, S. M., Kilgore, R. T., y Morris, J. L. (2012). Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts.(3th. ed.). FHWA-HIF-12-026. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/12026/hif12026.pdf
[10] United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service (USFS, 2008). Stream simulation: An ecological approach to provide passage for aquatic organisms at road stream crossing. U.S. Forest Service. Forest Service Simulation Working Group (FSSWG). Author. https://www.fs.fed.us/eng/pubs/pdf/StreamSimulation/hi_res/%20FullDoc.pdf
[11] Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department (VFWD, 2016). Vermont Stream Crossing Handbook. Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department.
Author https://vtfishandwildlife.com/sites/fishandwildlife/files/documents/Learn%20More/Library/REP ORTS%20AND%20DOCUMENTS/AOP/AOP%20HANDBOOK.pdf
Copyright © 2026 Miguel Enrique Blanco Chávez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License