A study on the application of written corrective feedback in senior high school students' English writing
Journal: Region - Educational Research and Reviews DOI: 10.32629/rerr.v7i1.3602
Abstract
This paper examines the use of written corrective feedback (WCF) in high school English writing, focusing on its impact, definition, classification, and effectiveness. WCF improves writing accuracy and complexity, but domestic research has limitations in scope and duration. The paper suggests expanding research, extending study durations, and exploring factors affecting WCF effectiveness to enhance teaching strategies and students' writing.
Keywords
written corrective feedback; English writing; senior high school students
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 2 TimesReferences
[1] Bitchener J, Storch N. 2016. Written Corrective Feedback for L2 Development. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
[2] Bitchener J, Knoch U. 2008. The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12(3): 409-431.
[3] Coyle Y, Larios JRD. 2013. Exploring the role played by error correction and models on children's reported noticing and output production in a L2 writing task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(3): 451-485.
[4] Chandler J. 2003. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3): 267-296.
[5] Chen YY. 2012. Analysis of errors in senior three students' English writing. Xi'an International Studies University.
[6] Ellis R. 2006. Researching the effects of form-focused instruction on L2 acquisition. AILA Review, 19(1):18-41.
[7] Ellis R, Sheen YH, Murakami M, et al. 2008. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3): 353-371.
[8] Ferris DR. 2004. The "Grammar Correction" debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1): 49-62.
[9] Ferris D, Roberts B. 2001. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: how explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3): 161-184.
[10] Ferris DR. 2002. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
[2] Bitchener J, Knoch U. 2008. The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12(3): 409-431.
[3] Coyle Y, Larios JRD. 2013. Exploring the role played by error correction and models on children's reported noticing and output production in a L2 writing task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(3): 451-485.
[4] Chandler J. 2003. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3): 267-296.
[5] Chen YY. 2012. Analysis of errors in senior three students' English writing. Xi'an International Studies University.
[6] Ellis R. 2006. Researching the effects of form-focused instruction on L2 acquisition. AILA Review, 19(1):18-41.
[7] Ellis R, Sheen YH, Murakami M, et al. 2008. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3): 353-371.
[8] Ferris DR. 2004. The "Grammar Correction" debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1): 49-62.
[9] Ferris D, Roberts B. 2001. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: how explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3): 161-184.
[10] Ferris DR. 2002. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Copyright © 2025 Leiyao CHEN, Xiaohui TIAN, Simeng LI, Di LIU

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License