Analysis of the problems of curriculum objectives of children's programming institutions
Journal: Region - Educational Research and Reviews DOI: 10.32629/rerr.v6i9.2630
Abstract
Children's programming, as an important part of youth science and technology training, has also ushered in a stage of strong development. As a supplement to public information technology education, children's programming institutions have their own unique internal contradictions - profitability and education. It is precisely the incorrect handling of this contradiction that has led to the alienation of the main product -- children's programming curriculum provided by children's programming institutions.
Keywords
children's programming; training institution; curriculum; curriculum objectives
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 0 TimesReferences
[1] Li BH, Wu LH. 2022. Interpretation and teaching suggestions of the 2022 edition of the compulsory education information technology curriculum standards. Primary and Secondary School Class Teacher, 16: 51-55.
[2] Sun LH, Zhou DH. 2019. Current status and action path of international children's programming education research. Open Education Research, 25(02): 23-35. DOI:10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2019.02.003
[3] Yang WA. 2008. The maintenance of public welfare of education and the boundary of for-profit education. Educational Theory and Practice, 1: 20-23.
[4] Fu CY, Huang WR. 2021. The implementation dilemma and breakthrough of children's programming education. Teaching and Management, 18: 19-22.
[5] Peng SQ, Zhang ZT. 2016. From subject knowledge to core literacy: the era transformation of textbook writing concepts. Educational Research, 37(12): 106-111.
[6] Zhong QQ. 2016. Curriculum development based on core literacy: challenges and issues. Global Education Outlook, 45(01): 3-25.
[7] Zhong ZX. 2013. Towards lifelong learning: the connotation, evolution and standards of information literacy. China Distance Education, 8: 21-29+95. DOI: 10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2013.08.015
[8] Tian H. 2019. Analysis of the phenomenon of "lower age" in programming education: a critical theory perspective. Basic Education, 16 (06): 19-26.
[9] Zhang ZQ. 2021. Pedagogical thinking and practical path of children's programming education. Forest Area Teaching, 11: 115-118.
[2] Sun LH, Zhou DH. 2019. Current status and action path of international children's programming education research. Open Education Research, 25(02): 23-35. DOI:10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2019.02.003
[3] Yang WA. 2008. The maintenance of public welfare of education and the boundary of for-profit education. Educational Theory and Practice, 1: 20-23.
[4] Fu CY, Huang WR. 2021. The implementation dilemma and breakthrough of children's programming education. Teaching and Management, 18: 19-22.
[5] Peng SQ, Zhang ZT. 2016. From subject knowledge to core literacy: the era transformation of textbook writing concepts. Educational Research, 37(12): 106-111.
[6] Zhong QQ. 2016. Curriculum development based on core literacy: challenges and issues. Global Education Outlook, 45(01): 3-25.
[7] Zhong ZX. 2013. Towards lifelong learning: the connotation, evolution and standards of information literacy. China Distance Education, 8: 21-29+95. DOI: 10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2013.08.015
[8] Tian H. 2019. Analysis of the phenomenon of "lower age" in programming education: a critical theory perspective. Basic Education, 16 (06): 19-26.
[9] Zhang ZQ. 2021. Pedagogical thinking and practical path of children's programming education. Forest Area Teaching, 11: 115-118.
Copyright © 2024 Jiangwei ZHAO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License