Research on Effectiveness Evaluation Methods and Indicator Systems for University Construction Projects
Journal: Region - Educational Research and Reviews DOI: 10.32629/rerr.v6i6.2242
Abstract
The method and indicator system for evaluating the effectiveness of university construction projects are indispensable management tools for higher education institutions. They provide a systematic approach and framework to comprehensively and objectively assess the performance and effects of projects. Through this method and system, we can quantify and measure various aspects of the project, thereby determining whether the project has achieved its intended goals and effects. This not only helps optimize resource allocation and improve management efficiency but also provides decision support for the long-term development of universities. Therefore, establishing and improving methods and indicator systems for evaluating the effectiveness of university construction projects is of significant importance for enhancing the quality of higher education and promoting the sustainable development of universities.
Keywords
effectiveness evaluation methods, indicator systems, university construction projects
Funding
2023 Yunnan Open University Scientific Research Fund Project, Research Path to Enhance the Effectiveness of University Construction Projects - Performance Evaluation and Quality Management (Project Number: 2023YNOU36)
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 3 TimesReferences
[1] Wu Yanguo. A Brief Discussion on Post-Evaluation of Construction Projects. Science and Technology Horizon. 2012; (22): 59-62.
[2] Liu Xueke. A Brief Discussion on Post-Evaluation of Construction Projects. Nonferrous Metals Engineering and Research. 2003; (4): 46-47.
[3] Min bing, Shu shiyong, Li Maoshu. Equipment investment project post evaluation investigation an example analysis[J]. Petroleum and petrochemical today. 2009; (04): 36-40.
[4] Tan Tao, Xiong Zhijian. A Comparative Study of Performance Evaluation Indicator Systems for Engineering Projects. Science and Technology Management Research. 2014; (23): 81-90.
[5] Wen Ya, Liu Zurong. Relevant Issues in Post-Evaluation of Projects. Contemporary Economics. 2011; (13): 41-43.
[6] Feng Lixia, Chen Yi. Reflections on Improving the Indicator System for Performance Evaluation of Engineering Projects. Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology. 2005; (01): 51-53.
[2] Liu Xueke. A Brief Discussion on Post-Evaluation of Construction Projects. Nonferrous Metals Engineering and Research. 2003; (4): 46-47.
[3] Min bing, Shu shiyong, Li Maoshu. Equipment investment project post evaluation investigation an example analysis[J]. Petroleum and petrochemical today. 2009; (04): 36-40.
[4] Tan Tao, Xiong Zhijian. A Comparative Study of Performance Evaluation Indicator Systems for Engineering Projects. Science and Technology Management Research. 2014; (23): 81-90.
[5] Wen Ya, Liu Zurong. Relevant Issues in Post-Evaluation of Projects. Contemporary Economics. 2011; (13): 41-43.
[6] Feng Lixia, Chen Yi. Reflections on Improving the Indicator System for Performance Evaluation of Engineering Projects. Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology. 2005; (01): 51-53.
Copyright © 2024 Jiaojiao Chen, Hu Yao
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License