Exploring Application of Grammarly to English Speech Draft Writing: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations
Journal: Region - Educational Research and Reviews DOI: 10.32629/rerr.v6i6.2241
Abstract
This paper critically examines the efficacy of Grammarly, an AI-driven writing tool, in facilitating the English speech drafting process among college students. Employing a descriptive qualitative research methodology, the study rigorously assesses the impact of Grammarly on student performance metrics. Findings reveal a substantive enhancement in average test scores, escalating from 53 to 86 out of 100 subsequent to Grammarly integration. Nonetheless, discernible challenges persist across lexical, syntactic, and segmental dimensions. Consequently, this paper engages in a nuanced discussion, offering recommendations to address these inherent limitations, thereby fostering an informed utilization of Grammarly within the pedagogical landscape of English writing.
Keywords
Grammarly, English speech writing, recommendations
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 2 TimesReferences
[1] Carnegie D. The Art of Public Speaking[M]. Massachusetts: Wyatt North Publishing, LLC; 2013.
[2] Reetz H, Jongman A. Phonetics: Transcription, production, acoustics, and perception[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2020.
[3] Lancaster S. Speechwriting: The expert guide[M]. England: The Crowood Press; 2018.
[4] Prayuda M S, Juliana J, Ambarwati N F, et al. Students’ Writing Error in Parts of Speech: A Case Study of EFL Students[J]. Journal Education FKIP UNMA. 2023; 9(2): 659-665.
[5] Fitriana K, Nurazni L. Exploring English Department Students’ Perceptions on Using Grammarly to Check the Grammar in Their Writing[J]. Journal of English Teaching. 2022; 8(1): 15-25.
[6] Fitria T N. Grammarly as AI-powered English writing assistant: Students’ alternative for writing English[J]. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching. 2021; 5(1): 65-78.
[7] Taylor L. Using qualitative research methods in test development and validation[J]. Research Notes, 2005, 21: 2-4.
[8] Reiss K. Type, kind and individuality of text: Decision making in translation[J]. The translation studies reader, 2000: 160-171.
[9] Ding Wangdao, Wubing. A Basic Course in Writing[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2014.
[10] Kacena M A, Plotkin L I, Fehrenbacher J C. The use of artificial intelligence in writing scientific review articles[J]. Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2024: 1-7.
[2] Reetz H, Jongman A. Phonetics: Transcription, production, acoustics, and perception[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2020.
[3] Lancaster S. Speechwriting: The expert guide[M]. England: The Crowood Press; 2018.
[4] Prayuda M S, Juliana J, Ambarwati N F, et al. Students’ Writing Error in Parts of Speech: A Case Study of EFL Students[J]. Journal Education FKIP UNMA. 2023; 9(2): 659-665.
[5] Fitriana K, Nurazni L. Exploring English Department Students’ Perceptions on Using Grammarly to Check the Grammar in Their Writing[J]. Journal of English Teaching. 2022; 8(1): 15-25.
[6] Fitria T N. Grammarly as AI-powered English writing assistant: Students’ alternative for writing English[J]. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching. 2021; 5(1): 65-78.
[7] Taylor L. Using qualitative research methods in test development and validation[J]. Research Notes, 2005, 21: 2-4.
[8] Reiss K. Type, kind and individuality of text: Decision making in translation[J]. The translation studies reader, 2000: 160-171.
[9] Ding Wangdao, Wubing. A Basic Course in Writing[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2014.
[10] Kacena M A, Plotkin L I, Fehrenbacher J C. The use of artificial intelligence in writing scientific review articles[J]. Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2024: 1-7.
Copyright © 2024 Pengbiao Zhang, Huan Yuan, Fengjunzi Wang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License