A Visual Analysis of Stance Markers Research in China and Abroad Based on Citespace
Journal: Region - Educational Research and Reviews DOI: 10.32629/rerr.v6i4.2055
Abstract
As an important linguistic phenomenon, stance markers have received extensive attention from scholars at home and abroad, in which authors can express their personal views and attitudes. Based on articles from CNKI and Web of Science, this paper presents comprehensive developments of the studies of stance markers between home and abroad from 2013 to 2022 with the help of Citespace visualization technology and bibliometric analysis method. The findings are as follows: 1) Domestic research is relatively scattered, and the research field is relatively broad. Foreign research fields are clear and more mature. 2) Domestic research is relatively scattered, and the research field is relatively broad; while the research field and evolution of foreign countries are clearer and more mature.
Keywords
stance markers, citespace, visual analysis
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 2 TimesReferences
[1] Traugott, Elizabeth. Expressions of stance-to-text: discourse management markers as stance markers [J]. Language Sciences. 2020; 82(11): 1-34.
[2] Shirin Rezaei, Davud Kuhi, Mahnaz Saeidi. Diachronic corpus analysis of stance markers in research articles: The field of applied linguistics, Cogent Arts & Humanities. 2021; 8(1): 1872165.
[3] Hyland K. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse[J]. Discourse Studies. 2005; 7(2): 173-191.
[4] Hyland, K. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse [J]. Discourse Studies. 2005; (01) : 173-192.
[5] Hadi Kashiha. Stance-taking across monologic and dialogic modes of academic speech [J]. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies. 2021; (39): 352-362.
[6] Chen Chaomei. Visualizing and Exploring Scientific Literature with CiteSpace: An Introduction to A Half-Day Tutorial[J]. CHIIR 18: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval. 2018; 5: 369-370.
[7] Chen Chaomei. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2006. 57(3): 359-377.
[2] Shirin Rezaei, Davud Kuhi, Mahnaz Saeidi. Diachronic corpus analysis of stance markers in research articles: The field of applied linguistics, Cogent Arts & Humanities. 2021; 8(1): 1872165.
[3] Hyland K. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse[J]. Discourse Studies. 2005; 7(2): 173-191.
[4] Hyland, K. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse [J]. Discourse Studies. 2005; (01) : 173-192.
[5] Hadi Kashiha. Stance-taking across monologic and dialogic modes of academic speech [J]. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies. 2021; (39): 352-362.
[6] Chen Chaomei. Visualizing and Exploring Scientific Literature with CiteSpace: An Introduction to A Half-Day Tutorial[J]. CHIIR 18: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval. 2018; 5: 369-370.
[7] Chen Chaomei. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2006. 57(3): 359-377.
Copyright © 2024 Mengxue Wang, Li Liu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License