Empirical Study on Factors Influencing Elementary School Students' Creative Questioning Ability Based on Classroom Interaction
Journal: Region - Educational Research and Reviews DOI: 10.32629/rerr.v5i8.2187
Abstract
In recent years, there has been increasing recognition of the importance of fostering creative questioning abilities among elementary school students. Creative questioning, defined as the ability to generate novel and insightful questions, is crucial for cognitive development and lifelong learning[2]. This study investigates the factors influencing elementary school students' creative questioning abilities within the context of classroom interaction. Understanding these factors is significant as it can inform educational strategies to enhance student engagement and critical thinking skills.
Keywords
elementary school students, classroom interaction, empirical study
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 2 TimesReferences
[1] Amabile, T. M. Creativity in context. Westview Press; 1996.
[2] Beghetto, R. A. Killing ideas softly? The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Information Age Publishing; 2013.
[3] Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for "mini-c" creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2007; 1(2): 73-79.
[4] Bowen, G. A. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal. 2009; 9(2): 27-40.
[5] Braun, V., Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006; 3(2): 77-101.
[6] Creswell, J. W. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications; 2013.
[7] Craft, A. Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Routledge; 2005.
[8] Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer; 1985.
[9] Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., Shaw, L. L. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press; 2011.
[10] Guilford, J. P. The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill; 1967.
[11] Hattie, J. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge; 2009.
[12] Israel, M., Hay, I. Research ethics for social scientists: Between ethical conduct and regulatory compliance. SAGE Publications; 2006.
[13] Kvale, S. Doing interviews. SAGE Publications; 2007.
[14] Patton, M. Q. Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications; 2015.
[15] Runco, M. A. Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier Academic Press; 2007.
[16] Runco, M. A. Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2nd ed.). Elsevier Academic Press; 2014.
[17] Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist. 2000; 55(1): 68-78.
[18] Sawyer, R. K. Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press; 2012.
[19] Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press; 1978.
[2] Beghetto, R. A. Killing ideas softly? The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Information Age Publishing; 2013.
[3] Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for "mini-c" creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2007; 1(2): 73-79.
[4] Bowen, G. A. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal. 2009; 9(2): 27-40.
[5] Braun, V., Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006; 3(2): 77-101.
[6] Creswell, J. W. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications; 2013.
[7] Craft, A. Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Routledge; 2005.
[8] Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer; 1985.
[9] Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., Shaw, L. L. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press; 2011.
[10] Guilford, J. P. The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill; 1967.
[11] Hattie, J. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge; 2009.
[12] Israel, M., Hay, I. Research ethics for social scientists: Between ethical conduct and regulatory compliance. SAGE Publications; 2006.
[13] Kvale, S. Doing interviews. SAGE Publications; 2007.
[14] Patton, M. Q. Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications; 2015.
[15] Runco, M. A. Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier Academic Press; 2007.
[16] Runco, M. A. Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2nd ed.). Elsevier Academic Press; 2014.
[17] Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist. 2000; 55(1): 68-78.
[18] Sawyer, R. K. Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press; 2012.
[19] Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press; 1978.
Copyright © 2024 Jia Ye
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License