Two types of Chinese donkey pronouns
Journal: Region - Educational Research and Reviews DOI: 10.32629/rerr.v5i6.1540
Abstract
Cheng and Huang's paper on donkey sentences has a great influence on analyzing the anaphoric relation in Chinese conditionals[1]. They propose that there are two types of conditionals: bare conditionals and ruguo/dou conditionals. These two conditionals have different anaphoric elements in relevant clauses and can be analyzed through two distinct strategies, namely unselective binding and E-type pronoun strategies [2]. However, exceptions exist. This paper aims to find out exceptions. After analyzing apparent exceptions both on bare conditionals and ruguo/dou conditionals, a possible solution provided by Pan and Jiang as a makeup to Cheng and Huang' paper will be shown [3]. They proposed that wh-phrases are preferential bound variables and most appropriate for showing a bare conditional, while pronouns are preferential to be an E-type pronoun and for most cases, which are appropriate for ruguo/dou conditionals. With the help of "Bound Variable Hierarchy", people will see not only a sentence itself but also see its context playing a role in its interpretation.
Keywords
donkey sentences; bare conditionals; ruguo/dou conditionals; anaphoric relation
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 3 TimesReferences
[1] Cheng LS, Huang J. 2020. Revisiting donkey anaphora in Mandarin Chinese: a reply to Pan and Jiang. Chinese Linguist, 7(2): 167-186.
[2] Rick N. 2020. E-type pronouns; Congressmen, sheep, and paychecks. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
[3] Pan HH, Jiang Y. 2015. The bound variable hierarchy and donkey anaphora in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 2(2): 159-192.
[4] Christopher P. 2002. No vacuous quantification constraints in syntax. M. Hirotani (ed). Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 32. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
[2] Rick N. 2020. E-type pronouns; Congressmen, sheep, and paychecks. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
[3] Pan HH, Jiang Y. 2015. The bound variable hierarchy and donkey anaphora in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 2(2): 159-192.
[4] Christopher P. 2002. No vacuous quantification constraints in syntax. M. Hirotani (ed). Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 32. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Copyright © 2024 Huan YUAN, Ying YIN, Xinjin SONG
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License