A survey of online learning engagement of local normal college students in the digital age
Journal: Region - Educational Research and Reviews DOI: 10.32629/rerr.v5i5.1517
Abstract
Learning engagement, as a key factor to measure students' learning results, has always been a research focus in the field of education. With the continuous development of digital technologies such as artificial intelligence, the current situation of online learning investment of online learners has attracted more attention. As an important part of China's higher education system, local normal universities take the cultivation of local high-quality excellent teachers as the core. Through the investigation and research on the behavior, cognition, emotion and interactive engagement of local normal college students, it is found that students have shortcomings in the above aspects. Combined with the research results, feasible learning engagement strategies are proposed from the perspectives of students, teachers, majors and school development. It provides suggestions for the development of local higher education and the improvement of online education quality.
Keywords
digital age; normal universities; online learning engagement; investigation and research
Funding
Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (No.23JK0436); Weinan Normal University 2023 School Level Education and Teaching Reform Research Project(No.JG202336); The 2023 Key Project of Shaanxi Provincial Education Association ( No. SJHZDKT2023010).
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 7 TimesReferences
[1] Pascarella ET, Seifert TA, Blaich C. 2010. How effective are the NSSE benchmarks in predicting important educational outcomes? Change the Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(1):16-22.
[2] Dixson MD. 2010. Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2):1-13.
[3] Schaufeli WB, Salanova M. 2002. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1):71-92.
[4] Li S, Yu C. 2015. Development and application of distance students' learning engagement evaluation scale. Open Education Research, 21(6):62-72.
[5] Wang GH. 2020. Study on the influence of college students' learner characteristics on the mixed learning effect of online and offline. Shaanxi Normal University.
[6] Lee E, Pate JA, Cozart D. 2015. Autonomy support for online students. Tech Trends, 9(4):54-61.
[7] Zhou Y, Han YF. 2018. A study of learner engagement in blended learning activities. Research on Audio-Visual Education, 39(11):99-105.
[8] Kuth GD. 2003. What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2):24-32.
[9] Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C. 2012. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. New York: Springer Science.
[2] Dixson MD. 2010. Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2):1-13.
[3] Schaufeli WB, Salanova M. 2002. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1):71-92.
[4] Li S, Yu C. 2015. Development and application of distance students' learning engagement evaluation scale. Open Education Research, 21(6):62-72.
[5] Wang GH. 2020. Study on the influence of college students' learner characteristics on the mixed learning effect of online and offline. Shaanxi Normal University.
[6] Lee E, Pate JA, Cozart D. 2015. Autonomy support for online students. Tech Trends, 9(4):54-61.
[7] Zhou Y, Han YF. 2018. A study of learner engagement in blended learning activities. Research on Audio-Visual Education, 39(11):99-105.
[8] Kuth GD. 2003. What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2):24-32.
[9] Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C. 2012. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. New York: Springer Science.
Copyright © 2023 Rui ZHANG
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License