Journal: Modern Economics & Management Forum DOI: 10.32629/memf.v7i3.5391
Abstract
The incorporation of data resources into the structure of corporate assets puts in question the financial accounting frame. In contrast to the empirical studies, this normative paper re-builds the logic of the measurement for the data asset from the point of view of the balance sheet (IAS 36) and income statement (IFRS 15). We show that the non-rivalrous, iterative nature of the data, voids the traditional discounted cash flow (DCF) model for the test of the impairment. At the same time the continuous service contract for the data creates a insurmountable ambiguity for the performance obligation and the transfer of control. The theoretical deduction of this study is grounded in the information asymmetry and not in the traditional utility functions. This shows how the elasity of the regulation is increasing the space of the professional judgment of the management which allows the opportunistic earnings management. This manipulation directly drives the inflation of the absolute discretionary accruals (|DA|). In this framework |DA| is used exclusively as the definitive dependent variable representing the quality of the accounting information, that captures the financial distortion in a different way from the independent variable of the disclosure of the data asset.
Keywords
data assets; impairment test; revenue recognition; information asymmetry; absolute discretionary accruals
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 6 TimesReferences
[1] Haskel, J. and Westlake, S., 2018. Capitalism without Capital: The Rise of the Intangible Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[2] Farboodi, M., Mihet, R., Philippon, T., and Veldkamp, L. Big data and firm dynamics. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 2019, 109: 38-42.
[3] Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Schrand, C. Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2010, 50(2-3): 344-401.
[4] Ramanna, K., and Watts, R. L. Evidence on the use of unverifiable estimates in required goodwill impairment. Review of Accounting Studies, 2012, 17(4): 749-780.
[5] Napier, C. J., Stadler, C. The real effects of a new accounting standard: The case of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Accounting and Business Research, 2020, 50(5): 474-503.
[6] Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., Wasley, C. E. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2005, 39(1): 163-197.
[7] Lev, B. Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2001.
[8] Li, Z., Shroff, N., Venkataraman, R., & Zhang, I. X. Causes and consequences of goodwill impairment losses. Review of Accounting Studies, 2011, 16(4): 745-778.
[2] Farboodi, M., Mihet, R., Philippon, T., and Veldkamp, L. Big data and firm dynamics. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 2019, 109: 38-42.
[3] Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Schrand, C. Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2010, 50(2-3): 344-401.
[4] Ramanna, K., and Watts, R. L. Evidence on the use of unverifiable estimates in required goodwill impairment. Review of Accounting Studies, 2012, 17(4): 749-780.
[5] Napier, C. J., Stadler, C. The real effects of a new accounting standard: The case of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Accounting and Business Research, 2020, 50(5): 474-503.
[6] Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., Wasley, C. E. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2005, 39(1): 163-197.
[7] Lev, B. Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2001.
[8] Li, Z., Shroff, N., Venkataraman, R., & Zhang, I. X. Causes and consequences of goodwill impairment losses. Review of Accounting Studies, 2011, 16(4): 745-778.
Copyright © 2026 Meiqi Yin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
