Journal: Modern Economics & Management Forum DOI: 10.32629/memf.v7i3.5390
Abstract
This paper examines the transnational practices and identity formation of sci-tech returned overseas Chinese in Hangzhou. Based on in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and policy-text analysis, it argues that their return should not be understood as a linear process of permanent resettlement, but as an open-ended form of return. These actors use Hangzhou as a strategic node for entrepreneurship, career development, and resource conversion, while maintaining overseas legal status, global markets, family arrangements, and future mobility options. Hangzhou therefore functions as an “interface city” that connects local innovation ecosystems, policy resources, overseas networks, and transnational capital. The study further shows that their social connections are increasingly organized around projects, industries, capital, and professional qualifications rather than traditional native-place or kinship ties. Their identity as returned overseas Chinese is produced through the interaction of mobility, local embeddedness, and organizational recognition.
Keywords
sci-tech returned overseas Chinese; open-ended return; interface city; transnational practice
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 5 TimesReferences
[1]Glick Schiller, N., & Çağlar, A. (2009). Towards a comparative theory of locality in migration studies: Migrant incorporation and city scale. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(2), 177–202.
[2]Levitt, P., & Glick Schiller, N. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1002–1039.
[3]Nowicka, M. (2013). Positioning strategies of Polish entrepreneurs in Germany: Transnationalizing Bourdieu’s notion of capital. International Sociology, 28(1), 29–47.
[4]Ong, A. (1999). Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality. Duke University Press.
[5]Saxenian, A. (2006). The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy. Harvard University Press.
[6]Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. Routledge.
[2]Levitt, P., & Glick Schiller, N. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1002–1039.
[3]Nowicka, M. (2013). Positioning strategies of Polish entrepreneurs in Germany: Transnationalizing Bourdieu’s notion of capital. International Sociology, 28(1), 29–47.
[4]Ong, A. (1999). Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality. Duke University Press.
[5]Saxenian, A. (2006). The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy. Harvard University Press.
[6]Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. Routledge.
Copyright © 2026 Chao Zhang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
