The Impact of Fiscal Subsidies on Market Structure: A Case Study of Oligopoly
Journal: Modern Economics & Management Forum DOI: 10.32629/memf.v6i6.4651
Abstract
Governments often use fiscal subsidies to promote industrial development, but whether these subsidies truly enhance market competitiveness remains controversial. This study takes China’s new energy vehicle (NEV) industry as an example, using panel data from 2021 to 2024 and multiple regression methods to investigate the impact of fiscal subsidies on market structure. The results show that fiscal subsidies are significantly positively correlated with market concentration (measured by CR4 and HHI), especially in years when subsidies are more concentrated or industry revenue is higher, with leading firms further expanding their market shares. This suggests that fiscal subsidies may unintentionally reinforce oligopolistic structures and suppress the growth potential of small and medium-sized enterprises. From the perspective of price mechanism theory, fiscal subsidies are, to some extent, equivalent to price floors, distorting the normal market adjustment process. This paper recommends that policymakers fully consider the long-term effects of support policies on market structure and the competitive environment to avoid weakening market vitality due to resource misallocation.
Keywords
fiscal subsidies, market structure, oligopoly, firm concentration, panel data, competition
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 5 TimesReferences
[2] Calzolari, G., Denicolò, V., & Scarpa, C. (2020). Subsidies and market power in oligopoly: Theory and evidence. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 71, 102621.
[3] Jinji, N. (2013). Strategic investment subsidies under asymmetric oligopoly. Review of Development Economics, 17(1), 77–89.
[4] Barrett, S. (1994). Strategic environmental policy and international trade. Journal of Public Economics, 54(3), 325–338.
[5] Tsitsiklis, J. N., & Xu, Y. (2012). Efficiency loss in a Cournot oligopoly with convex market demand. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1203.6675.
[6] Spencer, B. J., & Brander, J. A. (1983). International R&D rivalry and industrial strategy. Review of Economic Studies, 50(4), 707–722.
[7] Tian, Y., Zhao, L., & Zhu, M. (2023). Dynamic game of the dual-channel supply chain under a carbon subsidy policy. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2303.14598.
[8] Lambertini, L., & Tampieri, A. (2015). Incentives to innovate in a mixed oligopoly. Southern Economic Journal, 82(1), 168–186.
[9] Sugiyama, T., & Chang, Y. (2022). Optimal industrial policy in asymmetric oligopoly. Journal of Policy Modeling, 44(4), 795–814.
[10] Dai, Y. H. (2019). The impact of government R&D subsidies on firms’ technology choices (Master’s thesis, Southwest Jiaotong University).
[11] Chen, M. Y., & Zhao, C. C. (2012). Analysis of duopoly behavior in China’s refined oil pricing mechanism. Economy and Management, (10), 82–87.
[12] Wu, Y. C. (2008). Monopoly analysis and legal countermeasures in China’s real estate market (Master’s thesis, Southwest University of Political Science and Law).
[13] Yang, X. H., & You, D. M. (2022). Green technology innovation decisions with environmental awareness and government subsidies. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 30(9), 263–274.
[14] Xie, S. X., & Wang, X. S. (2011). Symmetric market structure, R&D efficiency, and government policy. World Economic Research, (5), 9–14.
[15] Ouyang, M. K., & Zhang, Y. B. (2018). Fiscal subsidies, distorted competition, and overcapacity in the auto industry. Fiscal Research, (12), 84–96,113.
[16] Liu, H. Z. (2021). Tiered subsidy mechanisms in the NEV industry (Master’s thesis, South China University of Technology).
[17] Meng, L. (2016). Impact of administrative barriers and vertical constraints on China’s oil industry (Master’s thesis, Shandong University).
[18] Xue, W. X., Feng, Z. X., & Chen, A. J. (2002). Game analysis of oligopoly markets. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 22(11), 82–86.
[19] Chen, X. S. (2009). A dynamic game model of oligopoly. Mathematical Practice and Understanding, 39(19), 56–62.
Copyright © 2025 Shiyun Shen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
