Fast Fashion Brand and Second-hand Clothing Market in Ghana: The Legitimacy of Fast Fashion

Journal: Modern Economics & Management Forum DOI: 10.32629/memf.v6i6.4640

Baolin Liu

University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1012 WP, Netherlands

Abstract

The dynamics of the global fast fashion industry have led to a substantial influx of second-hand garments into Ghana, with approximately forty percent being directly landfilled due to substandard quality, resulting in significant environmental degradation. Whilst this trade has resulted in greater employment opportunities for residents, it has substantially undermined the domestic textile sector. A series of labor rights issues have arisen due to inadequate regulatory protection. Utilizing an economic analytical framework, and drawing upon utilitarianism and Nozick's entitlement theory, this paper critically examines the moral legitimacy of the fast fashion industry. The analysis posits that, while the industry may yield short-term economic benefits, its long-term deleterious effects particularly environmental degradation and market inequities are persistent, thereby undermining its ethical legitimacy. The paper concludes with the proposal of relevant policy interventions and highlights the study's limitations.

Keywords

fast fashion industry, second-hand clothing trade, moral legitimacy, utilitarianism, noxious markets, entitlement theory

References

[1] Falk, A., & Szech, N. (2013). Morals and markets. Science, 340(6133), 707-711.
[2] Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2017). Microeconomics, Global Edition.
[3] Satz, D. (2010). Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale. The Moral Limits of Markets. New York: Oxford Press.
[4] Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2012). Some consequences of having too little. Science, 338(6107), 682-685.
[5] Besser, L. (2021). “dead white man’s clothes”: The dirty secret behind the world’s fashion addiction. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-12/fast-fashion-turning-parts-ghana-into-toxic-landfill/100358702.
[6] Cowen, T., & Tabarrok, A. (2018). Modern Principles of Economics. Macmillan International Higher Education.
[7] Bowles, S. (2008). Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine "The moral sentiments": Evidence from economic experiments. Science, 320(5883), 1605-1609.
[8] Taggart, G., & Zenor, J. (2022a). Evaluation as a moral practice: The case of virtue ethics. Evaluation and Program Planning, 94, 102140.
[9] Driver, J. (2014). The History of Utilitarianism. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Winter 2014.
[10] Vu, L., Soraperra, I., Leib, M., van der Weele, J., & Shalvi, S. (2023). Ignorance by choice: A meta-analytic review of the underlying motives of willful ignorance and its consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 149(9-10), 611-635.

Copyright © 2025 Baolin Liu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License