Discussion of the View That "the Widest Possible Participation Is the Most Important Aspect of Public Consultation in Government"
Journal: Modern Economics & Management Forum DOI: 10.32629/memf.v5i5.2904
Abstract
This paper explores the importance of public participation in government consultations, focusing on the debate over whether the widest possible participation is the most crucial aspect. It examines the role of public consultation in fostering transparency, inclusiveness, and democratic governance. While broad participation is shown to increase policy legitimacy and social stability, the paper also addresses potential drawbacks, such as inefficiency and the influence of interest groups. Through case studies from Australia and Canada, this study highlights both the benefits and challenges of extensive public involvement. Ultimately, the paper argues for a balanced approach that ensures effective consultation without compromising decision-making efficiency.
Keywords
public consultation, broad participation, policy-making, government transparency, interest groups
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 3 TimesReferences
[1]Burkett, I. (2012). An introduction to co-design. Sydney: Knode, 12.
[2]Fischer, F. (1993). Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy sciences, 26(3), 165-187.
[3]Stout, M., & Keast, R. (2021). Collaboration: What does it really mean?. In Handbook of collaborative public management (pp. 17-35). Edward Elgar Publishing.
[4]Kapoor, I. (2002). Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism? The Relevance of the Habermas-Mouffe Debate for Third World Politics. Alternatives, 27(4), 459-487.
[5]Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65.
[6]Evans, M., & Terrey, N. (2016). Co-design with citizens and stakeholders. Evidence-based policy making in the social sciences, 243-262.
[7]Blomkamp, E. (2018), The Promise of Co-Design for Public Policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77: 729-743.
[8]Martin, P., Alexandra, J., Holley, C., & Thoms, M. (2023). Murray-Darling Basin Plan mark II. What should stakeholders plan for?. Australasian Journal of Water Resources, 27(2), 211-222.
[9]Bobbio, L. (2019). Designing effective public participation. Policy and Society, 38(1), 41-57.
[2]Fischer, F. (1993). Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy sciences, 26(3), 165-187.
[3]Stout, M., & Keast, R. (2021). Collaboration: What does it really mean?. In Handbook of collaborative public management (pp. 17-35). Edward Elgar Publishing.
[4]Kapoor, I. (2002). Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism? The Relevance of the Habermas-Mouffe Debate for Third World Politics. Alternatives, 27(4), 459-487.
[5]Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65.
[6]Evans, M., & Terrey, N. (2016). Co-design with citizens and stakeholders. Evidence-based policy making in the social sciences, 243-262.
[7]Blomkamp, E. (2018), The Promise of Co-Design for Public Policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77: 729-743.
[8]Martin, P., Alexandra, J., Holley, C., & Thoms, M. (2023). Murray-Darling Basin Plan mark II. What should stakeholders plan for?. Australasian Journal of Water Resources, 27(2), 211-222.
[9]Bobbio, L. (2019). Designing effective public participation. Policy and Society, 38(1), 41-57.
Copyright © 2024 Sirong Lei
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License