Identification of the Non-technological Indicators on Companies' Innovation Ability
Journal: Modern Economics & Management Forum DOI: 10.32629/memf.v5i3.2372
Abstract
Innovation activities are the source of improving the status quo of the enterprise market, Long-term growth in profits depends significantly on firms' investment in innovation activities. Companies increasingly pay attention to innovate by simultaneously utilizing their available internal and external knowledge resources. This paper aims to explore the relationship among the innovation capabilities of companies and the non-technological indicators such as innovation expenditures and the number of highly educated employees. This paper based on previous research, conduct to the positive relationship among the number of employees with higher degree, the R&D expenses and innovation quality. This paper also conducts conclusion and implication for industry and academia.
Keywords
non-technological innovation indicators, enterprise innovation ability, R&D
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 1 TimesReferences
[1] Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2005). Organizational learning culture, learning transfer climate and perceived innovation in Jordanian organizations. International Journal of Training and Development, 9(2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2005.00224.x
[2] Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service Organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x
[3] Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., Seru, A., & Stoffman, N. (2017). Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation, and Growth*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 665–712. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw040
[4] Prajogo, D. I. (2006). The relationship between innovation and business performance—A comparative study between manufacturing and service firms. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(3), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.259
[5] Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.
[6] Taques, F. H., López, M. G., Basso, L. F., & Areal, N. (2021). Indicators used to measure service innovation and manufacturing innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.12.001
[2] Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service Organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x
[3] Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., Seru, A., & Stoffman, N. (2017). Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation, and Growth*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 665–712. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw040
[4] Prajogo, D. I. (2006). The relationship between innovation and business performance—A comparative study between manufacturing and service firms. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(3), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.259
[5] Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.
[6] Taques, F. H., López, M. G., Basso, L. F., & Areal, N. (2021). Indicators used to measure service innovation and manufacturing innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.12.001
Copyright © 2024 Zhuxin Yang
![Creative Commons License](http://licensebuttons.net/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License