Construction of Emergency Management Ecological Circle: Real Challenges and Path Selection
Journal: Modern Economics & Management Forum DOI: 10.32629/memf.v5i3.2270
Abstract
Under the background of high-quality development, various sectors of Chinese society are facing risks and challenges with many alienating characteristics. From the perspective of risk society, this is mainly manifested in the complexity, compounding, superposition, and convergence of risks, posing challenges to the fragmented, movement-oriented, and singular modes of traditional emergency management. It is imperative to construct a broad-spectrum, all-round, and diversified emergency management ecological circle model to effectively prevent and mitigate various risks and challenges in the new era. The construction of the emergency management ecological circle model is based on the highlighted alienation risk characteristics and the current status of emergency management, emphasizing the view of security issues from the perspective of development. Thus, placing the construction of emergency ecological circles within the framework of development-security, establishing a systematic and bottom-line thinking, and establishing sound mechanisms for risk warning, decision-making, coordination, and assessment ultimately promote the modernization of China's emergency management governance system and governance capacity through co-construction, co-governance, and sharing.
Keywords
emergency management, ecological circle construction, risk society, challenges and pathways
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 0 TimesReferences
[1] Beck, Ulrich. Risk Society. Nanjing: Yilin Press, 2004: 57, 36.
[2] Shan, Chunchang, & Xue, Lan. Introduction to Emergency Management. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2012.
[3] Zhao, Laijun et al. Emergency Management Systems and Practices of Major Countries in the World and Their Enlightenment. Beijing: Science Press, 2023: 177.
[4] Ma, Baocheng. Modernization of Emergency Management Systems and Capabilities. Beijing: National Academy of Governance Press, 13.
[5] Ma, Baocheng. China Emergency Management Development Report (2023). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2023: 004.
[6] Li, Peilin et al. Sociology of China. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2008: 835-836.
[7] Feng, Biyang. Social Risks: Perspectives, Connotations, and Causes. Tianjin Social Sciences, 2004(2): 74-78.
[8] Luhmann, Niklas. Risk: A Sociological Theory. Aldine Transaction, 1993.
[9] Tang, Jun. Emergency Management and Risk Management. Beijing: Emergency Management Press, 2021: 295.
[2] Shan, Chunchang, & Xue, Lan. Introduction to Emergency Management. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2012.
[3] Zhao, Laijun et al. Emergency Management Systems and Practices of Major Countries in the World and Their Enlightenment. Beijing: Science Press, 2023: 177.
[4] Ma, Baocheng. Modernization of Emergency Management Systems and Capabilities. Beijing: National Academy of Governance Press, 13.
[5] Ma, Baocheng. China Emergency Management Development Report (2023). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2023: 004.
[6] Li, Peilin et al. Sociology of China. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2008: 835-836.
[7] Feng, Biyang. Social Risks: Perspectives, Connotations, and Causes. Tianjin Social Sciences, 2004(2): 74-78.
[8] Luhmann, Niklas. Risk: A Sociological Theory. Aldine Transaction, 1993.
[9] Tang, Jun. Emergency Management and Risk Management. Beijing: Emergency Management Press, 2021: 295.
Copyright © 2024 Junbo Liu
![Creative Commons License](http://licensebuttons.net/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License