Optimized Combination Strategies for Hybrid Work Models in SMEs in the Post-COVID-19 Pandemic

Journal: Modern Economics & Management Forum DOI: 10.32629/memf.v4i5.1496

Yuzhen Liu

Jingdezhen Vocational University of Art, Jingdezhen 333000, Jiangxi, China

Abstract

This paper explores optimized combination strategies for implementing effective hybrid work models in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the post-COVID-19 pandemic landscape. As remote and on-site workflows become increasingly intertwined, SMEs face distinct challenges in strategically adopting these blended models catered to their unique organizational constraints. This research aims to address the lack of tailored guidelines for SMEs by consolidating insights across multiple disciplines including leadership, organizational behavior, and digital transformation theory. We employ a mixed-methods approach combining surveys, interviews, case studies and longitudinal tracking to examine diverse aspects of hybrid model efficacy in SMEs. Key results reveal that balance between flexibility and in-person collaboration is crucial, but optimum ratios vary across industries. Additionally, inclusion risks must be mitigated and policies personalized to meet generational preferences. Practical recommendations focused on change management and leadership upskilling can significantly enhance SME productivity. We conclude that purpose-driven hybridity centered on belonging and resilience holds strategic advantages for SMEs navigating workforce transformation. Further comparative research can reveal additional success factors for context-specific hybrid work models.

Keywords

hybrid work optimization, leadership in hybrid environments, digital transformation, employee well-being in SMEs, optimized combination strategies

Full Text

PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 11 Times

References

[1]Lakerveld, J.A., et al. 2022. Flexibility in the relation between creativity and hybrid working: Introducing the perception of instrumentality. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, p.1064.
[2]Meijer, M.H. et al. 2021. Engaged at work despite working from home: Work engagement among office-based and home-based employees. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, p.2945.
[3]Wang, B. et al. 2022. Explicating how and when hybrid working shapes organizational commitment: Conservation of resources theory and social exchange perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), p.5337.
[4]Bartsch, S. et al. 2021. The future of work in SMEs: a social exchange perspective on mobile working. Small Business Economics, 57(3), pp.1097-1114.
[5]Messersmith, J.G. and Guthrie, J.P. 2010. High performance work systems in emergent organizations: Implications for firm performance. Human resource management, 49(2), pp.241-264.
[6]Zheng, C. 2021. Digital transformation challenges facing small and medium enterprises in China in the post-pandemic era. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, p.792875.
[7]Li, W. et al. 2018. E-leadership: Evidence from China’s small and medium-sized enterprises. Chinese Management Studies.
[8]Zhao, X. et al. 2017. The impact of dynamic capabilities on organizational competitiveness in China: the moderating role of managerial competencies. Journal of Management Development, 36(5), pp.626-638.
[9]Nguyen, T.T. et al. 2022. Employees’ preference for hybrid work from the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for job attitudes. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2022.

Citing this article:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License