The Cracking Paths to Prevent Population out of Poverty from Returning to Poverty under the Strategy of Rural Revitalization — Take the Yunfu City of Guangdong Province as an Example

Journal: Modern Economics & Management Forum DOI: 10.32629/memf.v3i3.827

Yongxu Zheng, Peilin Chen, Qianyao Chen, Ziting Chen

Foshan University, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China

Abstract

In the context of the rural revitalization strategy, China has achieved a comprehensive victory in the war against poverty in 2021, and the task has changed from "comprehensive poverty eradication" to "prevention of poverty return". Due to the influence of various factors, households who have escaped from poverty have the risk of returning to poverty, so China must find a cracking path to prevent returning to poverty. This paper takes Yunfu City, Guangdong Province as an example, and through literature review and field research to understand the effectiveness of poverty eradication, industrial development, basic education and policy implementation in Yunfu City, it proposes the paths to strengthen the construction of leadership organizations, coordinate the effect of Sanyuan Juche and enrich rural education resources to benefit the effective connection between consolidating and expanding the results of poverty eradication and rural revitalization.

Keywords

rural revitalization; prevention of poverty return; cracking path

Funding

Foshan University Student Academic Fund "Study on the Risk Identification and Early Warning Policy of Poverty Return for the Population Out of Poverty in the Implementation of Rural Revitalization Strategy" (XSJJ202114ZSA01)

References

[1] Lei Xunping, Zhang Jing. Characteristics of poverty in post-2020 China, governance dilemmas and paths to break them[J]. Modern Economic Inquiry, 2020(08):24-28. DOI:10.13891/j.cnki.mer.2020.08.005.
[2] Li Bo. Resilient governance in consolidating poverty eradication results in deep poverty areas in the post-poverty era[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2020,20(04):172-180. DOI:10.19714/j.cnki.1671-7465.2020.0068.
[3] Shen Quanping. Research on the early warning mechanism of poverty return in the northeastern border ethnic areas in the "post-poverty alleviation era"[J]. Journal of Northern Nationalities University, 2020(06):41-48.
[4] Geng X. Analysis of the risk of returning to poverty and the influencing factors of the population returning to poverty in ethnic areas[J]. Journal of Yunnan University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2020,37(05):68-75. DOI:10.13727/j.cnki.53-1191/c.2020.05.011.
[5] Huang W, Zhu W. Multidimensional evaluation of precise help policies: an empirical analysis based on poverty alleviation practices in city B of G province[J]. Management World, 2021,37(10):111-128. DOI:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2021.0158.
[6] Wang ZZ, Wang J, Wei XB. Can precise poverty eradication and rural revitalization be integrated and connected? --Based on micro-survey data of 1158 farm households in 88 poor villages[J]. Journal of Social Sciences of Hunan Normal University, 2020,49(02):73-81. DOI:10.19503/j.cnki.1000-2529.2020.02.010.
[7] Liu Qian, Jiang Jinxiu, Yang Xing, Zhang Junyi, Yang Xinjun. Poverty Vulnerability Measure of Farming Households and Its Influencing Factors--An Empirical Analysis Based on Qinba Mountain Region[J]. Geography Research, 2022,41(02):307-324.
[8] Zhang Bo. Research on the governance mechanism of rural poverty return in the context of rural revitalization[J]. Southern Agricultural Machinery, 2022,53(04):85-89.
[9] Yi Gang. On the implication, dilemma and response of relative poverty[J]. Rural Economy, 2021(02):59-67.

Copyright © 2022 Yongxu Zheng, Peilin Chen, Qianyao Chen, Ziting Chen

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License