Loan Securitization in China's Financial Reform — Based on Evidence from Thirty-five Listed Banks in China
Journal: Modern Economics & Management Forum DOI: 10.32629/memf.v2i1.271
Abstract
This paper studies loan securitization in China's financial reform. By using Logit and Tobit model to study 35 Chinese listed commercial bank's data from 2012 to 2019, the author employs the factor analysis to summarize the information from some financial indicators that reveals banks' securitization determinants. The author also conducts a sensitive analysis and a credit-deposit relationship estimation to examine the impacts of loan securitization. It is found that determinants of China's banks' securitization include cost advantage exploitation and performance promotion. The incentive of risk transfer involves risks from stock market rather than non-performing loan. There is little evidence that loan securitization improves the income structure of banks and the investment efficiency of financial market. Moreover, the credit-deposit relationship of securitized banks is improved. The paper concludes that China's loan securitization market welcomes large banks with high quality loan rather than small banks. Default risks of banks themselves rather than that of loan customers affect bank's securitization decision more. Safe and high-yield spread business is still the best investment of loan securitization proceeds. The loan securitization market should be developed continuously and rapidly, which is of great implications to China's financial reform.
Keywords
loan securitization, factor analysis, China’s financial reform, Chinese commercial banks
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 2 TimesReferences
[2] Shen Bingxi. Asset Securitization and Financial Reform. Journal of Financial Research. 2006; 315(9): 104-117.
[3] Wu Qing. Asset Securitization of Commercial Banks and China's Financial Reform. Studies of International Finance. 1999; (12): 61-66.
[4] Affinito, M., and Tagliaferri, E. Why Do (or Did?) Banks Securitize Their Loans? Evidence from Italy. Journal of Finance. 2010; 6(4): 189-203.
[5] Agarwal, S., Chang, Y., and Yavas, A. Adverse Selection in Mortgage Securitization. Journal of Finance. 2012; 105(3): 640-661.
[6] Almazan, A., Martin-Oliver, A., and Saurina, J.Securitization and Banks’ Capital Structure. Corporate Finance. 2015; 4(2): 206-238.
[7] Ambrose, B., LaCour-Little, M., and Sanders, A. Does Regulatory Capital Arbitrage, Reputation, or Asymmetric Information Drive Securitization? Journal of Finance. 2005; 28: 113-134.
[8] Altman, E.I., (2000). Predicting Financial Distress of Companies: Revisiting the Z-score and Zeta Model. working paper. New York University
[9] Bensalah, N., and Fedhila, H. What Explains the Recourse of U.S. Commercial Banks to Securitization? Review of Accounting and Finance. 2016; 15(3): 317-329.
[10] Bertay Ata Can,Di Gong and Wolf Wagner. Securitization and Economic Activity: The Credit Compositionchannel. Journal of Financial Stability. 2017; 28: 225-239.
[11] Calem, P.S., and LaCour-Little, M. Risk-based Capital Requirements for Mortgage Loans. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2004; 28(3): 647-673.
[12] Cardone-Riportella,C., Samaniego-Medina,R., and Trujillo-Ponce, A. What Drives Bank Securitization? The Spanish Experience. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2010; 34(11): 2639-2651.
[13] Casu Barbara, Andrew Clare and Anna Sarkisyan, et al. Securitization and Bank Performance. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 2013; 45(8): 1617-1658.
[14] Cumming, C. The Economics of Securitization. Quart. Rev. 1987: 11-23.
[15] Chen Weizu, Chi-Chun Liu and Stephen G.Ryan. Characteristics of Securitizations that Determine Issuers’ Retention of the Risks of the Securitized Assets. The Accounting Review. 2008; 83(5): 1181-1215.
[16] DeMarzo Peter, Darrell Duffie. A Liquidity-based Model of Security Design. Econometrica. 1999; 67(1): 65-99.
[17] DeMarzo Peter M. The Pooling and Tranching of Securities: a Model of Informed Intermediation. The Review of Financial Studies. 2005; 18(1): 1-35.
[18] Farruggio, C., and Uhde, A. Determinants of Loan Securitization in European Banking. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2015; 56: 12-27.
[19] Greenbaum Stuart I. and Anjan V. Thakor. Bank Funding Modes: Securitization versus Deposits. Journal of Banking and Finance. 1987; 11(3): 379-401.
[20] Guo, G., and Wu, H. A Study on Risk Retention Regulation in Asset Securitization Process. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2014; 45: 61-71.
[21] He Jie, Jun Qian and Philip E. Strahan. Are All Ratings Created Equal? The Impact of Issuer Size on the Pricing of Mortgage-Backed Securities. The Journal of Finance. 2012; (6): 2097-2137.
[22] Landsman Wayne R., Kenneth V. Peasnell, Catherine Shakespeare (2008), Are Assets Securitizations Sales or Loans? Accounting Review
[23] Loutskina, E. The Role of Securitization in Bank Liquidity and Funding Management. Journal of Financial Economics. 2011; 100: 663-684.
[24] Minton B., Sanders A., Strahan P. E. (2004) Securitization by Banks and Finance Companies: Efficient Financial Contracting or Regulatory Arbitrage? Working Paper Series 2004-25, Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics.
[25] Martin-Oliver A., Saurina, J. Why Do Banks Securitize Assets? In: XV Spanish Finance Forum Conference Proceedings. Palma de Mallorca: Spanish Finance Association ; 2007.
[26] Merton R. C. On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates. The Journal of Finance. 1974; 29(2): 449-470.
[27] Yamazaki K. (2005) What Makes Asset Securitization “Inefficient”? Working Paper, bepress Legal Series. Available from: https://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/603/
[28] Zhang J, Yin Y, Zhang L. Determinants of Loan Securitization in Chinese Banking: Cost-benefit-based Analysis. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2018; 1-19.
Copyright © 2021 Fang Wang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License