A Study on the Design of Ideological and Political Teaching Cases in Linear Algebra
Journal: Journal of Higher Education Research DOI: 10.32629/jher.v7i3.5306
Abstract
Linear Algebra is a foundational course for science, engineering, economics, computer science, and data-related majors. However, in many classrooms it is still taught mainly through definitions, theorems, and mechanical calculation, which may weaken students’ understanding of its social value and humanistic significance. In the context of China’s curriculum-based ideological and political education, this paper explores how ideological and political elements can be naturally integrated into Linear Algebra through case-based teaching design. Based on constructive alignment, situated learning, and active learning theory, the study proposes a teaching case design framework consisting of “mathematical knowledge, application scenario, value implication, learning activity, and assessment evidence.” Three sample cases are discussed: matrix representation and national infrastructure planning, linear systems and scientific decision-making, and eigenvalues/eigenvectors and technological innovation. The paper argues that ideological and political education in Linear Algebra should not be added mechanically, but should arise from the internal logic of mathematical knowledge, the history of scientific development, and real social applications. Such design can improve students’ mathematical competence, social responsibility, scientific spirit, and confidence in applying mathematics to national and human development.
Keywords
Linear Algebra; curriculum ideology and politics; teaching case design; mathematical education; value education
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 0 TimesReferences
[1]Strang G. Introduction to Linear Algebra. Wellesley: Wellesley-Cambridge Press; 2016.
[2]Biggs J., Tang C. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2011.
[3]Anderson L.W., Krathwohl D.R., editors. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman; 2001.
[4]Lave J., Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
[5]Kolb D.A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1984.
[6]Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education. 2004; 93(3):223-231.
[7]Freire P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum; 1970.
[2]Biggs J., Tang C. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2011.
[3]Anderson L.W., Krathwohl D.R., editors. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman; 2001.
[4]Lave J., Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
[5]Kolb D.A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1984.
[6]Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education. 2004; 93(3):223-231.
[7]Freire P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum; 1970.
Copyright © 2026 Wenlin Huang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
