Moving Beyond Scores: Reforming Examination Feedback to Foster Student Development

Journal: Journal of Higher Education Research DOI: 10.32629/jher.v6i6.4700

Feifei Huang1, Zhaofeng Huang2

1. School of Education, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
2. School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Abstract

Recent educational assessment reforms in China mandate a fundamental shift from a singular focus on test scores toward comprehensive, diagnostic evaluations that support student development. However, a significant gap persists between these policy ambitions and current practices, which remain predominantly reliant on variable-centered analyses of composite scores. This article proposes a paradigm shift from a variable-centered to a person-centered analytical framework. We advocate for the application of two advanced statistical techniques, Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) and Multilevel Latent Class Analysis (MLCA). LPA allows for the identification of distinct, meaningful subgroups of students based on their multidimensional profiles of abilities and knowledge structures, moving beyond mere ranking to reveal heterogeneous learning patterns. Building on this, MLCA extends the analysis to account for the nested structure of educational data, enabling the simultaneous identification of latent typologies at both the individual and group levels. This integrated approach facilitates a more nuanced understanding of academic proficiency, providing a robust methodological foundation for generating diagnostic “student portraits” and “school profiles”. The article concludes that this person-centered, multilevel framework is not only a technical advancement but also a strategic imperative for aligning educational assessment with the national reform agenda, ultimately fostering equitable and high-quality education.

Keywords

latent profile analysis, multilevel latent class analysis, educational assessment reform

References

[1]Bergman, L. R., & Lundh, L. G. Introduction: The person-oriented approach: Roots and roads to the future[J]. Journal for Person-Oriented Research, 2015, 1(1): 1–6.
[2]Guan, D.D., Han, N., & Zhang, J.S. Deepening the Reform of Gaokao Evaluation by Focusing on “Four Evaluations”and Serving“Five Main Bodies”[J]. Journal of China Examination, 2021, (3): 1-8.
[3]Schmiege, S. J., Masyn, K. E., & Bryan, A. D. Confirmatory latent class analysis: Illustrations of empirically driven and theoretically driven model constraints[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2018, 21(4): 983–1001.
[4]Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. Latent class and latent transition analysis: wth applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2010.
[5]Vermunt, J.K. Multilevel latent class models[J]. Sociological Methodology, 2003, 33: 213-239.
[6]Henry, K.L., & Muthén, B. Multilevel Latent Class Analysis: An Application of Adolescent Smoking Typologies With Individual and Contextual Predictors[J]. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010, 17: 193-215.
[7]Zhang, J.T., Zhang, M.Q., Jiao, C., & Wang, L.T. Application of the Multilevel Latent Class Model to Educational Assessment: An Example from an English Academic Proficiency Test[J]. Educational Research and Experiment, 2013, (3): 78-84.

Copyright © 2026 Feifei Huang, Zhaofeng Huang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License