Preparing Students for the Internationalized World — Is Hong Kong Secondary English Curriculum Ready?
Journal: Journal of Higher Education Research DOI: 10.32629/jher.v3i6.1079
Abstract
To educate students for an internalized world and knowledge-based economy, education in Hong Kong needs to keep up with internalization of education. English's status as a global language is crucial to achieving the objective. Based on Rizvi's (2007) critique of curriculum internationalization, this paper examines the secondary English curriculum of Hong Kong as a case study and assesses the curriculum's readiness for internationalization at the policy, school, and classroom levels. The results of this study demonstrate that curriculum internationalization has had a subtle impact on secondary English curriculum decision-making, particularly at the office and school policy levels. However, because to Hong Kong's strongly engrained exam-oriented setting, internationalization adoption at the classroom level continues to be a difficult and convoluted process.
Keywords
internalization of curriculum, curriculum studies, case study, Hong Kong English curriculum, international education
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 5 TimesReferences
[2]EDB. (1999). Syllabuses for secondary schools: English language (secondary 1-5). Hong Kong: The Education Department.
[3]EDB. (2007). English language: Curriculum and Assessment Guide (secondary 4 – 6). Hong Kong: The Education and Manpower Bureau.
[4]Gregersen-Hermans, J. (2021). Toward a Curriculum for the Future: Synthesizing Education for Sustainable Development and Internationalization of the Curriculum. Journal of studies in international education, 25(4), p.461-481.
[5]Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations: politics, economics and culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
[6]Hustwit, R. (2013). 2013-2014 Parents’ evening: English language for grade 7. Retrieved from http://www.hkbuas.edu.hk/www/s/05curriculum/schoolbased/1314/EL_G07.pdf.
[7]Kennedy, K. J. (2005). Changing schools for changing times: new directions for the school curriculum in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
[8]Levitt, T. (1985). The Globalization of Markets. In Kantrow, A. M (Ed), Sunrise...sunset: challenging the myth of industrial obsolescence (pp. 53 – 68). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[9]Maassen, P., & Cloete, N. (2006). Global reform trends in higher education. In Cloete, N. (Ed.), Transformation in higher education: global pressures and local realities. Dordrecht, London: Springer; pp. 7 – 33.
[10]Munro, J. (2007). Learning internationally in a future context. In M. Hayden, J. Levy, & J. Thompson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of research in international education (pp. 338 - 367). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
[11]Rizvi, F. (2007). Internationalization of curriculum: A critical perspective. In M. Hayden, J. Levy, & J. Thompson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of research in international education (pp. 390-403). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
[12]Song, Y. (2021). 'Uneven consequences' of international English-medium-instruction programmes in China: a critical epistemological perspective. Journal of multilingual and multicultural development,42 (4), p.342-356.
Copyright © 2022 Feifei Liu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License