Loud Speaking Voice as a Behavioral Marker Supporting Secondary Prevention of the Cascade Consequences of Untreated Hearing Impairment

Journal: Journal of Clinical Medicine Research DOI: 10.32629/jcmr.v7i2.5287

Xinyue Cao1, Zilin Xu1, Caixia Xia2

1. Department of Biological Repositories, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, Hubei, China
2. Dean Office, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, Hubei, China

Abstract

More than 1.5 billion people live with some degree of hearing loss, yet most cases reach audiology only after years of delay, and the resulting cascade of cognitive, social, and functional decline accounts for a sizable share of preventable dementia risk in later life. We propose that an unusually loud speaking voice, a behavioral expression of the Lombard effect, can serve as an early observational cue prompting audiological referral. The response is largely involuntary and may persist even when the patient denies any subjective hearing difficulty, which makes it a candidate signal during routine clinical and family encounters. We outline three areas of practical relevance: earlier detection of treatable conductive losses, better alignment of treatment with periods of central auditory plasticity, and caregiver education that reframes loud speech as a clinical signal rather than a personality issue. We also set out the limits of the proposal, including the absence of formal sensitivity and specificity data and the need for cross-cultural validation. The argument is hypothesis-generating, and is intended to motivate prospective studies that combine acoustic voice analysis, audiometry, and longitudinal cognitive outcomes.

Keywords

hearing loss; Lombard effect; secondary prevention; behavioral marker; cognitive decline

References

[1]Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020; 396(10248): 413-446.
[2]Tsunada J, Wang X, Eliades SJ. Multiple processes of vocal sensory-motor interaction in primate auditory cortex. Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1): 3093.
[3]Ozker M, Hagoort P. Susceptibility to auditory feedback manipulations and individual variability. PLoS One. 2025; 20(5): e0323201.
[4]Boboshko MY, Garbaruk ES, Zhilinskaya EV, et al. Evaluation of speech perception deficit compensation in patients with hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2025; 1-14.
[5]Lin X, Xu Y, Fan C, Zhang G. Novel insights into mechanisms and therapeutics for presbycusis. Heliyon. 2024; 10(24): e40203.
[6]Ge J, Yan Y, Zhu Y, et al. Development and validation of the screening tool for age-related hearing loss in the community based on the information platform. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 281(6): 2893-2903.
[7]Lin FR, Pike JR, Albert MS, et al. Hearing intervention versus health education control to reduce cognitive decline in older adults with hearing loss in the USA (ACHIEVE): a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2023; 402(10404): 786-797.

Copyright © 2026 Xinyue Cao, Zilin Xu, Caixia Xia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License