Rural Reconstruction through Art: The Sinicized Construction of Earth Art Festivals

Journal: Arts Studies and Criticism DOI: 10.32629/asc.v7i3.5366

Zhen Zeng

University of the Arts London, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Earth Art breaks through the boundaries of traditional art spaces. Taking nature as its medium and locality as its core, it has become an important paradigm linking artistic creation and ecological issues. Along with the advancement of the Rural Revitalization Strategy, the Earth Art Festival, as a new form of practice for art to intervene in rural areas, has developed rapidly in China and achieved localized construction. This paper sorts out the theoretical origin of Earth Art, systematically sorts out its theoretical origin, development context, core characteristics and global practical experience, and focuses on the localized construction path in the Chinese context. Combined with the social context of Chinese rural areas, this paper analyzes the practical logic and value effects of typical cases such as Nanhai in Guangdong and Fuliang in Jiangxi, reveals the unique paths of China's Earth Art Festival in cultural inheritance, community activation, industrial empowerment and other aspects, and provides theoretical reference and practical reference for art to promote rural cultural revitalization and sustainable development in the new era.

Keywords

Earth Art; Earth Art Festival; locality; rural reconstruction through art; rural revitalization

References

[1]Kitagawa, F. (2005). Art for Regional Revitalization. Tokyo: Michi Publishing.
[2]Kanno, Y. (2018). Sociology of the Earth Art Festival. Tokyo: Michi Publishing.
[3]Yuan, R. (2024). Symbiosis of Art and Region: Exploring Feasible Paths for the Earth Art Festival in Garze Prefecture. Art Criticism.
[4]Dong, L. H. (2026). The Earth as an Art Medium: Earth Art, Ecological Art, and Planetary Art. Art Observation.
[5]Kastner & Wallis (ed.) — Land and Environmental Art
[6]Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste
[7]Múller M M. Cultural heritage protection: Legitimacy, property, and functionalism. International Journal of Cultural Property, 1998, 7(2): 395-409.
[8]Liu, X. C. (2008). Locality and Publicity of Intangible Cultural Heritage. Journal of Guangxi University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 30(3), 76–80.
[9]Jiang, Y. H. (2020). From Heterotopia to Folded Space: Foucault, Deleuze, and the Spiritual Dimension in Contemporary Land Art. Philosophical Research, 3, 112–120.
[10]Yu, X. M. (2025). The Idea and Practice of “Non-site” in Early Land Art. New Arts, 1, 171–179.
[11]Ma, W. J., & Yuan, J. (n.d.). Earth Art Creation in the Context of Chinese Culture. Art Work.
[12]Kastner, Jeffrey (2010). Land and Environmental Art. Phaidon Press. p. 14.
[13]Tate. (2017). Land art – Art Term. Retrieved from https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/l/land-art
[14]Galvin, S. (2022). X Marks the Land: Site-Specific Land Art, Indigenous Sovereignty and Ecological Revitalization in Desert X. Art Journal Open. https://artjournal.collegeart.org/?p=16566

Copyright © 2026 Zhen Zeng

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License