Journal: Arts Studies and Criticism DOI: 10.32629/asc.v7i3.5363
Abstract
This paper explores the aesthetic theory of “Significant Form” proposed by Clive Bell and developed by Roger Fry. Using literature review, theoretical analysis, and comparative research, it examines the origins, core ideas, and development of the theory. The study finds that Bell regarded significant form as the source of aesthetic emotion independent of representation, while Fry further emphasized the expressive function of form and its relationship with emotion. Although the theory has been criticized for overlooking social and historical contexts, it marked an important shift from representational art to formal expression and laid a significant theoretical foundation for modern formalist aesthetics and the development of twentieth-century art.
Keywords
significant form, Clive Bell, roger fry, formalist aesthetics, aesthetic emotion
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 5 TimesReferences
[2]Rao Jianhua. The formal beauty of Clive Bell and its sources [J]. Art Observation, 2012, (08): 117.
[3]Yang Ling. On art as significant form [J]. Xiwen, 2006(5): 67-69.
[4]Deng Huiwen. On the religious nature of Clive Bell’s aesthetic emotion [J]. Design Art Research, 2020, 10(06): 119-122.
[5]Xiao Hai’ou. “Two kinds of life” or two kinds of “reality”: Roger Fry and the modernist view of art [J]. Rongbaozhai, 2014, (04): 268-275.
[6]Huang Lijia. Roger Fry’s formalist aesthetic thought [J]. Journal of Xichang College (Social Science Edition), 2013, 25(01): 73-75+120.
Copyright © 2026 Yitong Tong, Mei Wang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
