The Absent Polyphonist: Reconstructing Spectator Identity in the Era of Images

Journal: Arts Studies and Criticism DOI: 10.32629/asc.v7i2.5119

Linli Yu¹, Anqi Zhang²

1. Qingdao Institute of Technology, Qingdao 266300, Shandong, China
2. Shandong University of Arts, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China

Abstract

The image has evolved beyond a mere visual medium into a force that actively reconstructs reality. The identity of the spectator has undergone profound transformations from the era of written language to the age of images. In the face of fragmented imagery, the subject — gradually rendered absent — becomes infinitely replicated within mass media and the industrialization of cinema, only to be reconstructed amid polyphonic flux. The "invasive" nature of images leads to the absence of the spectator’s subjective identity, while simultaneously resetting it through differential viewing practices. Though the spectator is suspended in a blur of self-awareness, audiovisual perception — mediated through the body schema — enables the experience of different roles and perspectives. Within the consumer landscape of mass culture, spectator identity thus emerges as a circulating, polyphonic system in which the roles of producer and consumer continuously alternate.

Keywords

images; spectator identity; absence; reconstruction

Full Text

PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 0 Times

References

[1] Mark Poster. The Second Media Age. Translated by FAN Jinghua (Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2001).
[2] Noël Burch. Praxis du cinema. Translated by ZHOU Chuanji (Beijing: China Film Press, 1992),115.
[3] Nicholas Mirzoeff. “An Introduction to Visual Culture”. In: TAO Dongfeng & JIN Yuanpu (Eds.). Cultural Studies (Vol. 3). Translated by WANG Youliang. (Tianjin: Tianjin Academy of Social Sciences Press, 2002),3.
[4] W. J. T. Mitchell. “The Pictorial Turn”. In: TAO Dongfeng & JIN Yuanpu (Eds.). Cultural Studies (Vol. 3). Translated by WANG Youliang.(Tianjin: Tianjin Academy of Social Sciences Press, 2002),19.
[5] John Jervis. “Image, Phantom and Spectacle: The Technology of Vision”. In: TAO Dongfeng & JIN Yuanpu (Eds.). Cultural Studies (Vol. 3). Translated by GU Xiaohui.(Tianjin: Tianjin Academy of Social Sciences Press, 2002), 113.
[6] Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Phénoménologie de la perception. Translated by JIANG Zhihui(Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2003).
[7] Christian Metz. Le Signifiant imaginaire. Psychanalyse et cinema. Translated by WANG Zhimin(Beijing: China Radio & Television Publishing House, 2006),12-13.
[8] Mike Featherstone. Consumer Culture and Postmodernism. Translated by LIU Jingming(Nanjing: Yilin Press, 2000).

Citing this article:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License