The "Presence" and "Trace" of Media: on the Reconstruction of The Materiality of Oil Painting in the Digital Age
Journal: Arts Studies and Criticism DOI: 10.32629/asc.v6i6.4748
Abstract
In the "post-media era" where digital image production, dissemination and consumption dominate, virtual images have constructed a universal "virtual presence". This article focuses on the inherent materiality of oil painting, arguing that it is not a remnant of nostalgia, but an aesthetic resistance that confirms “real presence” in the digital void. It evokes the embodied perception of the integration of body and mind through the visuality of touch, the condensation of time and the decisive traces of creation. The article reviews the revival of materiality theory from modernism to contemporary times. With the help of phenomenology and material culture research, it analyzes the contemporary return of the "aura" of oil paintings. Through artist cases and personal practice, it explains how materiality is actively "reconstructed" into a positive aesthetic strategy and philosophical statement.
Keywords
materiality of oil painting, digital age, presence, traces, phenomenology, media theory
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 0 TimesReferences
[1] Cai Weiding. Revisiting Benjamin’s theory of the disappearance of aura [J]. Philosophy and Culture, 2016, 43(4): 107-126.
[2] Shu Zhifeng. Occurrence, visibility and objecthood: Merleau-Ponty’s aesthetic theory and its contemporary effects [M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2020.P70-140
[3] Li Peng. Material that carries ideas--the use of lead in Kiefer’s art works[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai University, 2008.P1-10
[4] Pugliese M, Ferriani B, Rava A. Time, originality and materiality in contemporary art conservation. The theory of restoration by Cesare Brandi, between tradition and innovation[C]//J Bridgland. 15th triennial conference, New Delhi, 22-26 September 2008: preprints. ICOM Committee for Conservation, 2008: 484-488.
[5] Porceddu Cilione P A.The limits of the visible. For a microphysics of painting[J]. Piano B. Arti E Culture Visive,2017,2(2):43-67.
[6] Georges Didi-Huberman. Image Remains: The Life History of Images from Warburg to Contemporary Times. For the Chinese translation, please refer to the relevant publisher information. For an overview of the original theory, please refer to: Department of French, Central University. Image remains, cross-field and cross-culture[Z/OL].
[2] Shu Zhifeng. Occurrence, visibility and objecthood: Merleau-Ponty’s aesthetic theory and its contemporary effects [M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2020.P70-140
[3] Li Peng. Material that carries ideas--the use of lead in Kiefer’s art works[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai University, 2008.P1-10
[4] Pugliese M, Ferriani B, Rava A. Time, originality and materiality in contemporary art conservation. The theory of restoration by Cesare Brandi, between tradition and innovation[C]//J Bridgland. 15th triennial conference, New Delhi, 22-26 September 2008: preprints. ICOM Committee for Conservation, 2008: 484-488.
[5] Porceddu Cilione P A.The limits of the visible. For a microphysics of painting[J]. Piano B. Arti E Culture Visive,2017,2(2):43-67.
[6] Georges Didi-Huberman. Image Remains: The Life History of Images from Warburg to Contemporary Times. For the Chinese translation, please refer to the relevant publisher information. For an overview of the original theory, please refer to: Department of French, Central University. Image remains, cross-field and cross-culture[Z/OL].
Copyright © 2026 Yanfeng Wang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License