On the Artistic Value of Literary Ekphrasis

Journal: Arts Studies and Criticism DOI: 10.32629/asc.v2i2.326

Zhangfan Shangguan, Dong Wang

Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology

Abstract

As a language attribute that exists for visual arts, ekphrasis is not only a bridge to communicate poetry and painting, but also an important category in the cross-media and cross-disciplinary research of literature and art. Through the process of recreating paintings by using language as a medium, ekphrasis realizes the conversion from visual art to auditory art, and explores the richness of cognitive creation on the basis of the reproduction of visual art. In this process, the literary narrative diagram shows significant differences from the artistic doctrinal diagram, which are mainly reflected in the three levels of academic guiding ideology, narrative style difference, classic deconstruction and reconstruction, and language style writing paradigm. In addition, literary storytelling plays an important role in the writing of art history and the dissemination of artworks. It provides reference and inspiration for the current cross-border and in-depth integration of literature and art from the perspective of practical creation.

Keywords

literary ekphrasis, art history, value, communication

Funding

The General Project of the National Social Science Foundation (No. 15BZW037); The Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (No. KYCX20_0944)

References

[1] Mario Klarer. Ekphrasis. Routledge Encycllopedia of Narrative Theory. Ed. David Herman, Manfred Jahn, Marie-Laure Ryan. New York: Routledge; 2005.
[2] Maria Rubins. Crossroad of Arts, Crossroad of Culture: Ekphrasis in Russian and French Poety. New York: Multimodality and Intermediality.
[3] Li Jian. On "Artistic Words" as a Cross-Media Discourse Practice. Literature and Art Research. 2019; (2): 42
[4] Wang Dong. Research on "ekphrasis" as a subject category of art. Xinjiang Art Journal. 2016; (12): 83.
[5] Erwin Panofsky, Jas Elsner, Katharina Lorenz. On the Problem of Describing and Interpreting Works of the Visual Arts. Critical Inquiry. 2012; 38: 468.
[6] Li Xiao. Description and Interpretation Tradition in Western Art History. Shanghai University; 2018.
[7] Raymond A. Macdonald. Ekphrasis, Paradigm Shift, and Revisionism in Art History. Anthropology and Aesthetics. 1993; 24:112-123.
[8] Li Hong. Vasari's "Artistic Style" and its traditional origin in "The Biography of Famous People". New Art. 2003; (3): 39.
[9] Keats. Keats Poems, Translated by Tu An. Beijing: People's Literature Publishing House; 1997.
[10] Li Xiao. The history and function of Yige's poems. Journal of China Academy of Art. 2018; (1): 55.
[11] Wang Yong. The Art of Time and Space in the Poetry of William Carlos Williams. Papers of the International Symposium on American Poetry in the 20th Century in Wuhan, Hubei, China
[12] Chen Zhenlian. Introduction to Space Poetics. Shanghai: Shanghai Literature and Art Publishing House; 1989.
[13] Takahashi Yuko. History of Western Painting. Beijing: CITIC Publishing Group; 2017.
[14] WILLIAM W C. The Collected Earlier Poems of Willian Cardos Williams. New York: New Direcitions Press; 1938.
[15] James Heffernan. Cultivating Picturacy: Visual Art and Verbal Interventions. Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press; 2006.
[16] See Norman Bryson, Michael Ann Holly, Keith Moxey (eds). Visual Culture: Image and Interpretations. Hanover & London: Wesleyan University Press; 1994.
[17] Derrida. A crazy guardian thought: Interview with Derrida. He Peiqun, translated. Bao Yaming, proofreading. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House; 1997.
[18] Zhao Xianzhang. The homeopathic and contrarianism of the mutual imitation of language pictures-A new theory of the relationship between literature and image. Chinese Social Sciences. 2011; (3).

Copyright © 2021 Zhangfan Shangguan, Dong Wang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License