多模态违愿语义建构识别框架与教学中的价值
Journal: Modern Education Forum DOI: 10.12238/mef.v7i9.9183
Abstract
本研究从多模态角度对汉语违愿语义的建构和理解进行研究。以“X也是(的)”构式为例,比较了多模态汉语违愿语义教学和单模态汉语违愿语义教学的优劣。认为多模态汉语违愿语义教学更适合少数民族学生和来华留学生。研究表明,多模态汉语违愿语义教学在优化汉语语义教学模式、提高语义教学效果等方面发挥着重要作用。文章提出了多模态汉语违愿语义建构和识别分析框架,认为多模态汉语违愿语义的建构和理解需要考虑语言符号模态、非语言符号模态、认知方式、文化和语境等因素。
Keywords
多模态；违愿语义；建构；理解
Funding
2022年度内蒙古自治区直属高校基本科研业务费项目“汉语违愿类语义范畴的多模态语言学研究”的研究成果；2024年度内蒙古自治区教育科学规划课题“数智化背景下《语言学概论》课程多模态教学模式研究”的研究成果。
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 0 TimesReferences
[1] 赵秉志,陈聪聪.多模态话语分析理论框架下丝路精神融入高职英语的路径探索[J].海外英语,2021,(09):35-37.
[2] 仵婧祎,刘兴兵,赵平静.多模态视阈下连环画的人际意义研究——以Charles Schulz的《花生》为例[J].成都大学学报(社会科学版),2021,(03):110-118.
[3] 黄萍,蔡可阳.会话沉默的意义:基于体认语言观的多模态解析[J].外语学刊,2021,(06):115-122.
[4] J.R.Martin & Rose.2003.Working with Discourse——Mean ing Beyond the Clause.London:Bloomsbury.
[5] Kress,G & T.van Leeuwen.2001.Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication.London:Arnold.
[6] O’Halloran,K.L.2004.Multimoudal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives.London:Continuum.
[7] Royce,T.2002.Multimodality intheTESOLclassroom:expl oring visual-verbal synergy.TESOL QUARTERLY.
[8] van Leeuwen T.2005.Three models of interdisciplinar ity[A].In Wodak, Ruth and Paul Chilton. eds. A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis[C].Amsterdam.PA:John Benjamins Publication.
[9] Bezemer,J.G.Kress.2008."Writing inMultimodal Texts:AS ocial Semiotic Accountof Designs for Learning". Written Comm unication.
[10] 张德禄.多模态话语分析综合理论框架探索[J].中国外语,2009,6(01):24-30.
[2] 仵婧祎,刘兴兵,赵平静.多模态视阈下连环画的人际意义研究——以Charles Schulz的《花生》为例[J].成都大学学报(社会科学版),2021,(03):110-118.
[3] 黄萍,蔡可阳.会话沉默的意义:基于体认语言观的多模态解析[J].外语学刊,2021,(06):115-122.
[4] J.R.Martin & Rose.2003.Working with Discourse——Mean ing Beyond the Clause.London:Bloomsbury.
[5] Kress,G & T.van Leeuwen.2001.Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication.London:Arnold.
[6] O’Halloran,K.L.2004.Multimoudal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives.London:Continuum.
[7] Royce,T.2002.Multimodality intheTESOLclassroom:expl oring visual-verbal synergy.TESOL QUARTERLY.
[8] van Leeuwen T.2005.Three models of interdisciplinar ity[A].In Wodak, Ruth and Paul Chilton. eds. A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis[C].Amsterdam.PA:John Benjamins Publication.
[9] Bezemer,J.G.Kress.2008."Writing inMultimodal Texts:AS ocial Semiotic Accountof Designs for Learning". Written Comm unication.
[10] 张德禄.多模态话语分析综合理论框架探索[J].中国外语,2009,6(01):24-30.
Copyright © 2024 尹睿
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License