Modern Economics & Management Forum

[1] Tung, Chen-Yuan, Shuo-ting Chen. The Formation, Implementation and Dissolution of the 1992 Consensus. Prospect & Exploration 2, no. 12 (December 1993).
[2] Wu, Jaushieh Joseph. The United States as a Balancer in Cross-Strait Relations, 2000– 2008. The Future of United States, China, and Taiwan Relations, 2011, 121–47. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230118966_7.
[3] Xinhua. Full Text of the Report to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. Edited by Huaxia. Xinhua.com, October 25, 2022. https://english.news.cn/20221025/8eb6f5239f984f01a2bc45b5b5db0c51/c.html.
[4] Pierre, Cabestan J. Cross Strait Multiple Interactions in an Era of No High Level Contacts. China’s World 3, no. 1 (2018): 60–80.
[5] Wu, Charles Chong-Han. The End of Washington’s Strategic Ambiguity? The Debate over U.S. Policy toward Taiwan. China Review 21, no. 2 (May 2021): 177–202.
[6] Sharma, Dave. Taiwan Has Lost Ground Because of Pelosi’s Visit. Nikkei Asia. Nikkei Asia, August 13, 2022. https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Taiwan-has-lost-ground-because-of-Pelosi-s-visit.
[7] Blanchette, Jude, Charles Edel, Christopher B. Johnstone. Speaker Pelosi’s Taiwan Visit: Implications for the Indo-Pacific. Speaker Pelosi’s Taiwan Visit: Implications for the Indo-Pacific | Center for Strategic and International Studies, November 21, 2022. https://www.csis.org/analysis/speaker-pelosis-taiwan-visit-implications-indo-pacific.
[8] Sil, Rudra, and Peter J. Katzenstein. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
[9] College of William & Mary. TRIP 2017 U.S. Faculty Survey Report. Williamsburg: College of William & amp; Mary, 2017.
[10] Katzenstein, Peter J., and Nobuo Okawara. Japan, Asian-Pacific Security, and the Case for Analytical Eclecticism. International Security 26, no. 3 (2002): 153–85. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228801753399754.
[11] Cornut, Jérémie. Analytic Eclecticism in Practice: A Method for Combining International Relations Theories. International Studies Perspectives 16, no. 1 (2014): 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12072.
[12] Weissmann, Mikael. Understanding Power (Shift) in East Asia: The Sino-US Narrative Battle about Leadership in the South China Sea. Asian Perspective 43, no. 2 (2019): 223–48. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2019.0009.
[13] Clark, Cal. The Taiwan Relations Act and the U.S. Balancing Role in Cross-Strait Relations. American Journal of Chinese Studies 17, no. 1 (April 2010): 3–18.
[14] Keng, Shu, Lu-Huei Chen, and Kuan-Po Huang. Sense, Sensitivity, and Sophistication in Shaping the Future of Cross-Strait Relations. Issues & Studies 42, no. 4 (December 1, 2006): 23–66.
[15] Keng, Shu, and Gunter Schubert. Agents of Taiwan-China Unification? the Political Roles of Taiwanese Business People in the Process of Cross-Strait Integration. Asian Survey 50, no. 2 (2010): 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2010.50.2.287.
[16] Lai, Yun‐Chen. The Reaction of Taiwan Civil Society towards Cross‐Strait Integration during the Period from 2008 to 2016: Spillover or Politicization? Pacific Focus 37, no. 1 (2022): 36–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12203
[17] Matsuda, Yasuhiro. China after Reform and Opening Up: China’s Policy toward Taiwan. International Politics 112 (n.d.): 123–38.
[18] Lee, Wei-chin. Multiple Shades of China’s Taiwan Policy after the 19th Party Congress. Journal of Asian and African Studies 55, no. 2 (2020): 201–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909620905063.
[19] Taiwan.cn. Taiwan Authorities Suspend the Small Three Links. Taiwan.cn, February 2020. http://www.taiwan.cn/taiwan/jsxw/202002/t20200207_12240160.htm.
[20] Chen Rongsan. Looking into Small Three Links Policy. Taiwan News 15 (2000): 1–2.
[21] Law and Regulation Database of Republic of China. Trial Implementation Measures for Navigation between Kinmen, Mazu, Penghu and Mainland Areas. moj.gov.tw, July 17, 2018. https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=A0030123.
[22] Wei Ai. Effective Planning of The Cooperation Model for Cross-Strait Economic Integration Through Small Three Links . The 3rd Cross-Strait Economic, Trade and Cultural Forum, April 2007, 75–89. https://doi.org/140.119/21983.
[23] Chi Po-Tung. A Study of the Influences of the ‘Mini-Three-Links’ over the Changes in the Population in Kinmen and Matsu. Journal of National Kinmen University 5, no. 2 (2015): 13–35.
[24] Wang Wei-huang. A Feasibility of the Economic Integration of Kinmen and Xiamen After the Launch of Mini-Three Links, 2004. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/q2p59v.
[25] Wang Shin-Tui. A Study on the Kinmen Citizens’Trust on Mainland Chinese Society after the Mini Three Links, 2008. https://doi.org/https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5w6nnb.
[26] Hao Yuran. Taiwanese Investment in the Mainland Has Increased Steadily. gov.cn, January 26, 2022. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-01/26/content_5670567.htm.
[27] Fong Jung Fong. The Impacts of Three Links on Taipei City Property Market, 2008. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/da699q.
[28] Cai, Kevin G. Cross-Taiwan Straits Relations since 1979 Policy Adjustment and Institutional Change Across the Straits. Singapore: World Scientific, 2011.
[29] Wang, Lee-Rong, and Chung-Hua Shen. The Economics of the “Three Links”. Sources of Conflict and Cooperation in the Taiwan Strait, 2006, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812707314_0004.
[30] Mainland Affairs Council. Cross-Strait Three Links Policy Description. mac.gov.tw, October 1, 1999. https://www.mac.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=AD6908DFDDB62656&sms=161DEBC9EACEA333&s=4D5DC4F9606D3D5B.
[31] Xu Xue-yi. “2+19” New Measures. Xinhua.net, April 29, 2021. http://www.xinhuanet.com/2021-04/29/c_1127393822.htm.
[32] Liou Chiou-Hwa. The Study on the Effects of Mini-Three Links to the Prospects of Matsu’s Economic Development, 2003. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/yxhy5x.
[33] Taiwan.cn. 5 Sets of Data to See 30 Years of Cross-Strait Exchanges. Taiwan.cn, November 10, 2017. http://www.taiwan.cn/taiwan/shujuxinwen/201711/t20171109_11865551.htm.
[34] Ministry of Commerce PRC. Text and Annexes of “Framework Agreement on CrossStrait Economic Cooperation”. Mofcom.gov.cn, September 21, 2010. http://tga.mofcom.gov.cn/article/zt_ecfa/subjectii/201009/20100907153618.shtml.
[35] Li Wei. What Detonated Taiwan Student’s Anti-Service Trade. The New York Times. The New York Times, March 29, 2014. https://cn.nytimes.com/china/20140329/cc29taiwan/.
[36] Vick. Why Did the Service Trade Agreement Become a Political Storm in Taiwan?. BBC News. BBC, March 19, 2014. https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/china/2014/03/140319_taiwan_parliament.
[37] Huang, David W.F. On Spillover Effect of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement: Perspectives from the European Model of Functional Integration. New Dynamics in Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations, 2013, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203068205-11.
[38] Chen Ming-Tong. China’s Intention to Enact the Anti-Secession Law with Influence. New Century Think Tank Forum 29 (March 30, 2005): 20–24.
[39] Lin, Syaru Shirley. National Identity, Economic Interdependence, and Taiwan’s CrossStrait Policy: The Case of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement. New Dynamics in Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations, 2013, 49–64. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203068205-12.
[40] Japan External Trade Organization. 10th Anniversary of ECFA (China, Taiwan): Regional Analysis Report. JETRO, January 27, 2020. https://www.jetro.go.jp/biz/areareports/2020/edda4aa011fff856.html.
[41] Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council. 26 Points and 31 Points with Five New Features. gov.cn, November 2019. http://www.gwytb.gov.cn/zccs/zccs_61195/a26tacs/201911/t20191113_12217879.htm.
[42] Hao Yuran. Help Taiqing Walk the First Mile of Development in the Mainland. gov.cn, May 2022. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-05/11/content_5689686.htm.
[43] Ye Tang and Nan Liu, The Influence of Economic and Trade Participation on Taiwan Youth Cross-Strait Economic and Trade Attitudes - Based on the Empirical Analysis of TNSS in 2019, Contemporary Taiwan Studies 3 (2021): pp. 44-52, https://doi.org/10.16650/j.cnki.xdtwyj.2021.03.007.
[44] Tung, Chen-Yuan, and Shuo-ting Chen. The Formation, Implementation and Dissolution of the 1992 Consensus. Prospect & Exploration 2, no. 12 (December 1993).
[45] Tang Shubei. Tang Shubei’s Speech at the Symposium on the 20th Anniversary of the ‘1992 Consensus’. district.ce.cn, November 26, 2012. http://district.ce.cn/zg/201211/26/t20121126_1311234.shtml.
[46] Chen, Yu-Jie, and Jerome A. Cohen. China-Taiwan Relations Re-Examined: The ‘1992 Consensus’ and Cross-Strait Agreements. Asian Law Review 14, no. 1 (2019).
[47] Shambaugh, David L. Tangled Titans the United States and China. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2013.
[48] Roy, Denny. Prospects for Taiwan Maintaining Its Autonomy under Chinese Pressure. Asian Survey 57, no. 6 (2017): 1135–58. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2017.57.6.1135.
[49] Tudoroiu, Theodor. Taiwan in the Caribbean: A Case Study in State De-Recognition. Asian Journal of Political Science 25, no. 2 (2017): 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2017.1334146.
[50] Taylor, Ian. Taiwan’s Foreign Policy and Africa: The Limitations of Dollar Diplomacy. Journal of Contemporary China 11, no. 30 (2002): 125–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560120091174.
[51] Fabry, Mikulas. Recognizing States: International Society and the Establishment of New States since 1776. The SHAFR Guide Online, February 2010. https://doi.org/10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim050060005.
[52] Caspersen, Nina. Degrees of Legitimacy: Ensuring Internal and External Support in the Absence of Recognition. Geoforum 66 (2015): 184–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.10.003.
[53] Badell, Taciana Fisac, Fernández-Stembridge Leila, Yun-Han Chu, Chia-Lung Lin. Consolidating Taiwan’s New Democracy amid Competing National Identities. Essay. In China Today: Economic Reforms, Social Cohesion, and Collective Identies. London: Routledge Curzon, 2003.
[54] Chen, Rou-Lan. Beyond National Identity in Taiwan: A Multidimensional and Evolutionary Conceptualization. Asian Survey 52, no. 5 (2012): 845–71. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2012.52.5.845.
[55] Wang, Hongying, Yeh-Chung Lu. The Conception of Soft Power and Its Policy Implications: A Comparative Study of China and Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China 17, no. 56 (2008): 425–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560802000191.
[56] Lin Peixuan . The Four Soft Powers of Land, Love, People, and Accumulation Let the World See Taiwan. Foresight Magazine, October 29, 2019. https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/69047.
[57] Ni, Vincent. Beijing-Backed Chinese Language Schools in UK to Be Replaced with Teachers from Taiwan. The Guardian. Guardian News and Media, September 18, 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/18/beijing-backed-chinese-language-schools-in-uk-to-be-replaced-with-teachers-from-taiwan.
[58] Matsuda, Yasuhiro. Taiwan’s Partisan Politics and Its Impact on U.S.-Taiwanese Relations. Regime Change and Foreign Policy 63, no. 3-4 (2011): 73–94. https://doi.org/10.34607/jssiss.63.3-4_73.
[59] Lv, Hsiu-lien. Do You Agree That Taiwan Should Declare Peace and Neutrality to the World? National Referendum Ballot Hearing Records. cec.gov.tw, May 9, 2019. https://web.cec.gov.tw/upload/file/2019-05-28/d5f42529-ae37-40bf-aa1f15bf0660ebe8/6bc2152320feaa6402b39c0af7c9698e.pdf.
[60] Chen, Kuan-Ting, and Joe Baldock. US Moves Toward ‘Strategic Clarity’ Reveal Old Rifts in China-US Relations. The Diplomat, September 22, 2022. https://thediplomat.com/2022/09/us-moves-toward-strategic-clarity-reveal-old-rifts-in-china-us-relations/.
[61] White, Hugh, Robert Ayson, Jonathan Pryke, and Milton Osborne. “Taiwan: Biden Risks Talking Himself into a War He Cannot Win. Lowy Institute, September 20, 2017. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/taiwan-biden-risks-talking-himself-war-he-cannot-win.
[62] Kawashima, Shin, Urara Shimizu, Yasuhiro Matsuda, and Eimei Yo. Nittai Kankeishi: 1945 - 2008. Zohoed. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press, 2020.
[63] Nohira, Yuuichi. Parliamentary Diplomacy Is Extremely Important. Asahi News Digital, August 8, 2022. https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASQ885GYXQ88UTFK011.html.
[64] Nikkei News. Japan-China Parliamentarians’ Round-Table Conference to Visit Taiwan in October. Nikkei News, September 7, 2022. https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUA077KH0X00C22A9000000/.
[65] Guo, Jianping. Lengzhan Hou Mei Ri Ou Meng Yu Taiwan Guanxi Yanjiu. Beijing: Jiuzhou, 2009.
[66] Lawson, Stephanie, and Seiko Tannaka. War Memories and Japan’s ‘Normalization’ as an International Actor: A Critical Analysis. European Journal of International Relations 17, no. 3 (2010): 405–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110365972.
[67] Niwa, Fumio. Nobusuke Kishi and Chiang Kai-Shek: Realities of Honeymoon Relations. Journal of Taiwan Studies, Takushoku University 3 (March 18, 2019): 1– 25. https://doi.org/http://id.nii.ac.jp/1579/00000212/.
[68] Wakamiya, Yoshibumi. You Can Understand Prime Minister Abe’s Diplomacy by Looking at Nobusuke Kishi’s Movements. 10MTV, February 24, 2014. https://10mtv.jp/pc/content/detail.php?movie_id=64.
[69] Ogasawara, Yoshiyuki. Lee Teng-Hui Evaluation and Ideological Structure in Japan. Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. Accessed October 25, 2022. http://www.tufs.ac.jp/ts/personal/ogasawara/analysis/LeeTeng-huiandjapansideology.html.
[70] Go Ei-jin. Social Movements, Re-Establishment of Democracy, National Integration: Reconstruction of Civil Society and Civic Nationalism in Modern Taiwan (2008-2010). Interlaced Taiwanese Society 600 (2012): 311–66. https://doi.org/10.20561/00042222.
[71] Ogasawara, Yoshiyuki. Preface. Taiwan Political Overview: Political Changes in Democratization and Taiwanization. Introduction. In Taiwan Sōtō Senkyo, 1–25. Kyōto-shi: Kōyō Shobō, 2019.
[72] Cheng Su-Feng. Identity in the 2012 Taiwanese Presidential Election. Questions and Research 52, no. 4 (December 1, 2013): 101–32. https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.201312_52(4).0004.
[73] Yau Cody Wai-kwok. The Meaning of ‘Taiwanese’: Conceptualizing the Components of Taiwanese National Identity. Election Studies 23, no. 2 (November 1, 2016): 1–54. https://doi.org/10.6612/tjes.2016.23.02.01-54.
[74] Wu Chenshu. A Study on the ‘Natural Independence’ Phenomenon of Taiwanese Youth. Contemporary Youth Studies 3 (2016): 94–99.
[75] ETtoday. Tsai Ing-Wen: Taiwan Independence Is A ‘Natural Ingredient’ for the Younger Generation. ETtoday, July 20, 2014. https://www.ettoday.net/news/20140720/380352.htm.2014-7-20.
[76] Lv Jiahong. Taiwan Kuomintang Party Chairman Election: Are Young Party Members An Alternative Among the ‘Natural Independence’ Generation. BBC News , September 24, 2021. https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/chinese-news-58636178.
[77] Jiang Xinli. There Is No ‘Natural Independence’, Only ‘Man-Made Independence’. Jiuding 129 (July 15, 2018): 47–51.
[78] Pierre, Cabestan J. Cross Strait Multiple Interactions in an Era of No High Level Contacts. China’s World 3, no. 1 (2018): 60–80.
[79] Levine, Steven I. The Making of the Taiwan Relations Act by David Tawei Lee. Political Science Quarterly 116, no. 2 (2001): 332–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/798081.
[80] Pillsbury, Michael. U.S. Debates about Taiwan’s Security, 1979–2009. The Future of United States, China, and Taiwan Relations, 2011, 209–42. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230118966_11.
[81] Hu, Richard W. The TRA, Cross-Strait Relations, and Sino-U.S. Relations: Searching for Cross-Strait Stability. The Future of United States, China, and Taiwan Relations, 2011, 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230118966_4.
[82] Devine, Peter. Strategic Ambiguity Isn’t Working to Deter China on Taiwan – It Will Invade Anyway. It’s Time to Commit. Just Security, September 2, 2022. https://www.justsecurity.org/82912/strategic-ambiguity-isnt-working-to-deter- china-on-taiwan-it-will-invade-anyway-its-time-to-commit/.
[83] Wu, Charles Chong-Han. The End of Washington’s Strategic Ambiguity? The Debate over U.S. Policy toward Taiwan. China Review 21, no. 2 (May 2021): 177–202.
[84] Mastro, Oriana Skylar. The Precarious State of Cross-Strait Deterrence. FSI, February 18, 2021. https://fsi.stanford.edu/publication/precarious-state-cross-strait-deterrence.
[85] Glaser, Bonnie S., Michael J. Mazarr, Michael J. Glennon, Richard Haass, and David Sacks. Dire Straits. Foreign Affairs, June 11, 2021. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-09-24/dire-straits.
[86] Weissmann, Mikael. Understanding Power (Shift) in East Asia: The Sino-US Narrative Battle about Leadership in the South China Sea. Asian Perspective 43, no. 2 (2019): 223–48. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2019.0009.
[87] Hagström, Linus, and Astrid H Nordin. China’s ‘Politics of Harmony’ and the Quest for Soft Power in International Politics. International Studies Review 22, no. 3 (2019): 507–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz023.
[88] Trunkos, Judit. Comparing Russian, Chinese and American Soft Power Use: A New Approach. Global Society 35, no. 3 (2020): 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1848809.
[89] Xinhuanet. Foreign Ministry Spokesperson: The Causes and Consequences of the Current Tension in the Taiwan Strait Are Clear, and the Right and Wrong Are Clear at a Glance. Xinhuanet, August 6, 2022. http://www.gwytb.gov.cn/bmst/202208/t20220806_12458793.htm.
[90] Sil, Rudra, and Peter J. Katzenstein. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.